• Lmaydev@programming.dev
    ·
    10 months ago

    I doubt most people use an adblocker.

    Anyone who's aware of these issues or cares about them really should have been smart enough to switch to Firefox a long time ago.

      • AlpineSteakHouse [any]
        ·
        10 months ago

        DuckDuckGo is also so much better for search results since Google made theirs shit.

        I can find websites pretty easy on DuckDuckGo which just don't exist on Google.

      • machiabelly [she/her]
        ·
        10 months ago

        damn google has really gotten shit then. I used to avoid duckduckgo because of how much better google was.

        • D3FNC [any]
          ·
          10 months ago

          Google used to be like "we have found 10 quadrillion websites with your term" and you could click page 173 and it would give you the list for as many times as you wanted to click

          Then they went to giving you several pages but if you clicked past page two they would be like hahaha psych there are actually only two pages of results for "starcraft two newbie tips"

          Now I'll search for specific phrases I know I read somewhere and I'll get like, three god damn results.

          Really? On the entire internet? Three results?

          It's just disrespectful and insulting

    • SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip
      ·
      10 months ago

      Which makes this even more annoying. Like you have good chunk of the world using your browser with ads, but you still want even more and are still taking these types of scummy actions.

      • Lmaydev@programming.dev
        ·
        10 months ago

        I think they're taking aim at people who use an adblocker because it's simple and won't bother if they make it harder than installing an extension.

  • shath [comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    waaah please watch this piss poor ad that we spent 20 million on to get in front of your face only for you to skip it or ignore it entirely we are taking any possibility you will not see this away so you HAVE to you HAVE to buy it

    [redacted] yourself you fucking parasites

  • AlpineSteakHouse [any]
    ·
    10 months ago

    This will do nothing to stop Google Chrome's market share tbh.

    Installing an ad blocker is like the easiest thing in the world to do. Literally takes less time than watching the ad yet even most young people don't use it. It's the reason why Edge has such a high market share despite not being all that great. It's the default for many people so inertia will carry it forward. Google Chrome could literally record your screen at all times and sell it to the highest bidder and it would still dominate the market.

  • Radioactive Radio@lemm.ee
    ·
    10 months ago

    It won't do anything to their market share. At work my colleagues keep asking me "Why don't you use chrome?" or saying things like "Isn't Firefox slow?". They simply don't know or don't care to know. Also Firefox IS slow or just doesn't work, not because it's a bad browser but I've been seeing a trend of websites being designed to make it appear slow, like YouTube takes 5 extra secs on Firefox to load videos Clipcham and Adobe outright not supporting Firefox on their websites. The internet is a clown show.

  • NutWrench@lemmy.ml
    ·
    10 months ago

    Back before web browsers had ad-blocking extensions, we had programs like Web Washer. It was a local, ad-blocking proxy program that you ran along side your browser. To use it, you just changed your browser's network settings to point to Web Washer. And the ads would be filtered before they even reached your browser. It would be no problem to implement this again.

  • SootySootySoot [any]
    ·
    10 months ago

    Given how quickly everyone I know took to using Chrome on phones despite no adblock being available, I think sadly it won't have as big an impact as I wish it would.

  • corbin@infosec.pub
    cake
    ·
    10 months ago

    uBlock Origin has a Manifest V3 version, it's not going anywhere. I swear there are more people not reading anything here than Facebook.

    • Da_Boom@iusearchlinux.fyi
      ·
      10 months ago

      Nah, there's a big difference between what and how much you're allowed to block in V2 vs V3 - the current status V2 adblock is way outside the range of V3's version.

      I'd say V3 blockers can probably block at best 30% of what V2 can block. Which means it has to be selective. It essentially nuders the extension, making it worthless - an adblocker that only blocks some ads is not an adblocker at all. It's more of an ad restrictor, and in heavily monetized sites it might not even be that.

  • ComradeWeebelo@lemm.ee
    ·
    10 months ago

    I remember when Chrome released and it was a hot mess performance wise. I haven't used it since and it doesn't seem like I'm missing anything.

    • Perfide@reddthat.com
      ·
      10 months ago

      The last straw for me was about a decade ago when an update completely broke Chrome on my machine. It would open and immediately crash, even after reinstalling. Everything else worked fine, virus scans came back clean and everything, it was only Chrome. I spent the next 2 months playing browser roulette before settling on ol' reliable Firefox once again.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    ·
    10 months ago

    It didn’t even make sense, because the point of Google was never to make money anyway. The point of Google was to make investors believe it was worth billions of dollars.