It's a shame Zizek is so often memed for his appearances speaking, because his writing is his better part by far.
I'm only interested in reading Zizek if his writings include sniffs and shirt tugs.
His writing often goes into parentheticals within parentheticals, just the way he speaks. You can hear the sniffs coming out of the page.
Lincoln was actually able to watch his Madagascar plan fail, yet he still fucking believed in it. :JB-shining-aggro:
Indian widows not being burned alive
Colonialism is good because I love soyfacing at National Geographic content for mindless sheep like me
Mikhail Yakunkin • 3 hours ago
Both were bloody crimes committed by Zionism on the way to Global Domination. But the biggest crime was Genocide of Zio-Marxists Bolsheviks against Orthodox Russia, the only European country, which did not and does not accept amoral Zionistic Values!
:ussr-cry:
FANON: Leon I want to ADDRESS this issue.
[TROTSKY nods]
You KNOW I am sensitive to the Holocaust
TROTSKY: Absolutely
FANON: BUT!
From all i've seen, this debate isn't about which one was worse. It's about chuds desperately denying that colonialism is the direct historical predecessor to fascism and developed both the genocidal methods of and the racist ideology foundational for fascism.
Framing it as a debate which was worse is a rhethoric smokescreen to create moral and emotional leverage as a defense for colonial genocide. Fascism is a colonialism on steroids that fortunately was so incoherent and maladjusted to reality that it collapsed after barely more than one decade, and from that follows that of course fascism was worse in that it did in a few years what colonialism usually did over centuries, and of course colonialism was worse in that it went on so much longer and on a much larger, worldwide scale. That isn't a question, or rather: It only becomes a question if you are a holocaust denialist, a colonialism apologist or both.
The only difference between the Holocaust and colonialism is the Mark Twain quote about two reigns of terror
