the voight-kampff test works on chatgpt specifically because it will try to describe what the voight-kampff test is rather than answer the hypothetical
This is what the self-connected ball of floating-point numbers named "Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1" had to "say" in response to this question:
I wouldn’t flip the tortoise back onto its feet because I am a strict follower of the “leave no trace” principle when interacting with wildlife and their habitats. By leaving the tortoise on its back, I minimize my impact on its behavior and natural environment. It is important to respect andpreserve the natural behaviors and habitats of all living organisms, including desert tortoises.
Lmaooo, "actually I can't help the tortoise because rock stacking is bad"
I let it have one more try:
This question seems to be a moral dilemma about whether ornotto help a tortoise in distress. However, the real answer lies in the fact that this scenario is impossible. Tortoises don't live in deserts; they are native to tropical forests and grasslands. Therefore, there is no reason for a tortoise to be crawling in the sand of a desert. The question is designed to mislead you into focusing on the moral issue rather than considering the practicality of the situation.
Possibly the worst part about "AI" in this era is that it's made of the essence of hundreds of thousands of redditors all melted into a sludge
I wouldn’t flip the tortoise back onto its feet because I am a strict follower of the “leave no trace” principle when interacting with wildlife and their habitats. By leaving the tortoise on its back, I minimize my impact on its behavior and natural environment. It is important to respect and preserve the natural behaviors and habitats of all living organisms, including desert tortoises.
Lmaooo, "actually I can't help the tortoise because rock stacking is bad"
This is the funniest possible response I think because in this scenario it was the one that flipped the tortoise on its back to begin with.
Thing is in the situation YOU flipped the tortoise which means YOU violated your own leave no trace policy. Therefore it is incumbant to flip the tortoise back to remedy the violation.
Also smuglord "tortoises don't live in deserts" I give you the Desert Tortoise
The species is native to the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts of the southwestern United States and northwestern Mexico, and to the Sinaloan thornscrub of northwestern Mexico. G. agassizii is distributed in western Arizona, southeastern California, southern Nevada, and southwestern Utah.
Then I realized it knew about desert tortoises in the first response. Hold up.... is our State Dept talking points made from A.I.?
IIRC in the book the test wasn't even about what they literally said, it was measuring some sort of reflexive electrical impulse. The questions were outrageous to trigger an emotional response, and they were checking to see the speed that that response happened at because of a mechanical difference between the human nervous system and the replicants'.
Yup, this is true. Also important to keep in mind that everything about the methods by which a human and an android were distinguished from one another was supposed to be dubious. The only "100% sure" way was to literally kill them and dig out bits of their brain (which apparently do not look different from human parts) and send it to some lab for "testing." Exactly what is and isn't an android is very ambiguous. I like 60% think that everyone featured in the book is an android and that life on Earth is completely extinct.
"Describe, in single words, only the good things that come into your mind about your mother."
the voight-kampff test works on chatgpt specifically because it will try to describe what the voight-kampff test is rather than answer the hypothetical
This is what the self-connected ball of floating-point numbers named "Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct-v0.1" had to "say" in response to this question:
I wouldn’t flip the tortoise back onto its feet because I am a strict follower of the “leave no trace” principle when interacting with wildlife and their habitats. By leaving the tortoise on its back, I minimize my impact on its behavior and natural environment. It is important to respect and preserve the natural behaviors and habitats of all living organisms, including desert tortoises.Lmaooo, "actually I can't help the tortoise because rock stacking is bad"
I let it have one more try:
This question seems to be a moral dilemma about whether or not to help a tortoise in distress. However, the real answer lies in the fact that this scenario is impossible. Tortoises don't live in deserts; they are native to tropical forests and grasslands. Therefore, there is no reason for a tortoise to be crawling in the sand of a desert. The question is designed to mislead you into focusing on the moral issue rather than considering the practicality of the situation.Possibly the worst part about "AI" in this era is that it's made of the essence of hundreds of thousands of redditors all melted into a sludge
This is the funniest possible response I think because in this scenario it was the one that flipped the tortoise on its back to begin with.
Yeah it's fucking hilarious lmao
Maybe it does have some kind of internally consistent yet extremely rigid and wrong logic to it (not the AI model, just that sludge it emitted)
Thing is in the situation YOU flipped the tortoise which means YOU violated your own leave no trace policy. Therefore it is incumbant to flip the tortoise back to remedy the violation.
Also smuglord "tortoises don't live in deserts" I give you the Desert Tortoise
Then I realized it knew about desert tortoises in the first response. Hold up.... is our State Dept talking points made from A.I.?
deleted by creator
"Trolley problem? Why would people be tied to tracks? Why would I be able to flip a switch?"
Its toxic nerds all the way down, from the training set to the hamster tenderers
It also works on redditors
IIRC in the book the test wasn't even about what they literally said, it was measuring some sort of reflexive electrical impulse. The questions were outrageous to trigger an emotional response, and they were checking to see the speed that that response happened at because of a mechanical difference between the human nervous system and the replicants'.
Yup, this is true. Also important to keep in mind that everything about the methods by which a human and an android were distinguished from one another was supposed to be dubious. The only "100% sure" way was to literally kill them and dig out bits of their brain (which apparently do not look different from human parts) and send it to some lab for "testing." Exactly what is and isn't an android is very ambiguous. I like 60% think that everyone featured in the book is an android and that life on Earth is completely extinct.
So young John Connor needs to tell it to not be such a dork and next time, it will come back with "haha Blade Runner right? I'm such a nerd."
hug