• Tommasi [she/her, pup/pup's]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Agreed, but that's because of choices the writers make. Wish it was more common to see writers being critical of the idea of AI as people

    • Antoine_St_Hexubeary [none/use name]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      It was super weird on ST:TNG how Data and the Ship's Computer weren't really that far apart in terms of functionality but no one ever treated the latter as though it were sentient.

      Is there a misogyny angle here?

    • ElmLion [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      The thing is: AI that isn't like people is very boring and depressing, so it doesn't make for good stories or particular insights. I'm not sure it's the job of stories to be like you finish a three hour movie and the moral is "hey AI is kinda underwhelming and lame".

      • Tommasi [she/her, pup/pup's]
        ·
        2 years ago

        Not sure I agree, today's AI are too simply to make that interesting, but I think sci-fi featuring AI that's advanced enough to imitate sentience, while not actually having sentience, could make for stories that are both entertaining and poignant

        • ElmLion [any]
          ·
          2 years ago

          That's a fair point, you might be right. I could imagine dystopian sci-fi having it as a some kind of plot point.

      • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
        ·
        2 years ago

        It's not interesting as a person because it isn't a person. But it could be for example a plot point that AI is being used by villains to monitor people and that's an interesting setup for a story about AI