ah yes, the famously satirical masters, the founding fathers - people who didn't own slaves and weren't so deeply racist that they wrote at length about how racist they were.
Adams was an elite partly responsible for setting up a deeply, deeply racist global empire. We are people living in the fallout of these decisions. You are a subhuman racist cracker bastard who can't see the difference. Simple as.
The people of the world spit on each and every one of the white bastards who you revere as gods, deal with it.
You may have something there. Apparently Adams didn't own slaves and deliberately hired free black people. Idk of that proves this was satire but it at least opens the door to the possibility.
I bet you think Jonathan swift eats babies too. And you pretend to be intellectuals!
ah yes, the famously satirical masters, the founding fathers - people who didn't own slaves and weren't so deeply racist that they wrote at length about how racist they were.
Oh so John Adams owned slaves now?
lmao what a gotcha. you really understood the content of my point. making common cause with slavers is definitely exculpatory.
And I’m sure you don’t live in “the west” that you hate so much, making common cause with capitalism?
You should also look up the word exculpatory, don’t think it means what you think it does.
Get your irredeemably stupid ass the fuck out of my beloved site you silly cracker ape.
Removed by mod
Adams was an elite partly responsible for setting up a deeply, deeply racist global empire. We are people living in the fallout of these decisions. You are a
subhumanracist cracker bastard who can't see the difference. Simple as.The people of the world spit on each and every one of the white bastards who you revere as gods, deal with it.
Hey now. Language. I know we make Yakubian ape jokes a lot but "subhuman" is an explicitly Nazi term.
Nvm my apologies, thats fucked up of me to use it, ill replace it with a more fitting term
🥰
it means exactly what I think. an element or factor is exculpatory when it excuses or otherwise positively recharacterizes a legal or ethical crime.
you live in society, how can you possibly critique it.
Removed by mod
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Not an argument
Not a reply
deleted by creator
If you weren’t smart enough to understand the reference, you wouldn’t get the point.
deleted by creator
Yes, we all know about a Modest Proposal, it's just not clear why you referenced it.
You may have something there. Apparently Adams didn't own slaves and deliberately hired free black people. Idk of that proves this was satire but it at least opens the door to the possibility.