• stoy@lemmy.zip
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That was probably fairly accurate at that time.

    Look at the historical data here:

    https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions

    BTW, the large recent drop in co2 emissions, covid.

  • eleitl@lemm.ee
    ·
    2 months ago

    To be fair, in 1912 it was not at all obvious at which scale humanity started to burn everything after 1950.

  • micnd90 [he/him,any]
    ·
    2 months ago

    What's funny about that newspaper excerpt is that it is word-for-word plagiarized from a picture caption in earlier article in Popular Mechanics, March 1912

    Show

    The reporter for Rodnen and Otamatea Times must've been on tight deadlines!

  • frezik@midwest.social
    ·
    2 months ago

    That may end up being correct. The models predicting the most catastrophic effects are often showing that for 2100, which would be nearly 200 years from the publish date.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      ·
      2 months ago

      And my friends and family wonder why I'm not having kids. I'm sure eager to bring new life in right before one of the most cataclysmic events of humanity, that's for sure.

  • DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
    ·
    2 months ago

    The thing that really gets me about these ignorant fuckers is it's not just the indisputable math, it's that we've observed the proof not just in our ecosystem, but on Venus. You can't even pretend we don't know how these systems work in at least a general sense.

  • lenuup@reddthat.com
    ·
    2 months ago

    just could not imagine the scale at which human civilization would escalate. Apart from that, spot on.

  • filcuk@lemmy.zip
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why did they not print the whole of 'Affecting' on a new line, that's bothering me