Dunno, I've never seen a consistent tendency attached to Radlib(or at least ive never picked upon it if there is), and I've never seen someone self-identify as a Radlib before either(lol, please prove me wrong). I think it should still be safe.
I had someone on here use it to describe far right libertarians which to me feels totally incorrect.
i mean vaushite is already in use and could serve as a slightly more general term
Anarcho-liberal or liberal-anarchists is a term I've been using since Sean KB said it on the antifada.
Anlib for short
I object on the basis that I can see this being unironically appropriated by radlibs.
a beatnik is someone who
displayed the more superficial aspects of the Beat Generation literary movement
So they could be a play on that; aniks, anarchniks, libnik so on
I can't think of any reason why any individual on this forum would object
Fauxarchist emphasizes the illegitimacy of their claims to anarchism. Otoh, maybe it's still confusing/derogatory.
Also because it only keeps the -archist suffix I guess the technical meaning of Fauxarchist is "rule by phonies" or something.
4chanarchists isn't entirely accurate, but I like a good pun
