Judges have to, by law, make a decision that does not conflict federal law. That's what I meant by judges no longer having the power to nullify laws. If there is a conflict between state law and federal law, they have to follow federal law.
The point is that decisions related to laws are only made by directly elected people, rather than the appointed judges.
The Vanguard party would be, ideally, the communist party that is elected and has the majority in government, and therefore is the one who appoints the judges in the first place.
Judges have to, by law, make a decision that does not conflict federal law. That's what I meant by judges no longer having the power to nullify laws. If there is a conflict between state law and federal law, they have to follow federal law.
The point is that decisions related to laws are only made by directly elected people, rather than the appointed judges.
The Vanguard party would be, ideally, the communist party that is elected and has the majority in government, and therefore is the one who appoints the judges in the first place.