Nah, Boston is gorgeous, the buildings and sidewalks are pretty, there's a lot of public green space, and the river and harbor are both gorgeous, and it's a lot less of a tech bro dystopia than SF
Just cause Chicago is pretty doesn't mean Boston isn't prettier. The Charles has more green space along its banks, it's not just wall-to-wall skyscrapers, and the harbor is part of a real ocean 😤
Plus the buildings are older and the sidewalks are often brick with marble curbs instead of ugly concrete. At least we can agree that SF is not the nicest city in the states
I know, I've never seen Boston spelled that way before
Ma'am pls don't embarrass yourself. You're wrong.
Nah, Boston is gorgeous, the buildings and sidewalks are pretty, there's a lot of public green space, and the river and harbor are both gorgeous, and it's a lot less of a tech bro dystopia than SF
I mean c'mon look at these: https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/ETZW8Fo4Wi.jpg
https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/ngfRAx7ouT.jpg
The architecture, the skyline can't be compared when you visit. And the lake. So fucking beautiful.
Chicago comrade, posting to agree.
I mean, https://tobyharriman.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Boston-Charles-River-Aerial-Photography-Downtown-1.jpg
https://frugalfrolicker.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/wpid7087-sailing-boston-harbor.jpg
Just cause Chicago is pretty doesn't mean Boston isn't prettier. The Charles has more green space along its banks, it's not just wall-to-wall skyscrapers, and the harbor is part of a real ocean 😤
Plus the buildings are older and the sidewalks are often brick with marble curbs instead of ugly concrete. At least we can agree that SF is not the nicest city in the states
You're all incorrect Oildale, California is far superior to whatever crab-infested hellmouth's you all live at
:left-unity-2:
:solidarity: