I have at no point said people who aren't workers aren't persons or lose their humanity. The owner class really isn't made up of those incapable of working. However. lots of people in the working class are. Most people are able to, and in fact want to be productive in some capacity. Making art, cooking, cleaning, sex work, and emotional labor are all legitimate fields of work that contribute to society. lot of people are doing these things now and not being recognized for their efforts, who would be under communism. And it would be a lot easier to say to everyone at your factory who know exactly what your doing "I'm taking a month or two off, I'm feeling burnt out" than it is to say that to a boss who will replace you in a second. And for the small handful of people who genuinely are just completely unable to produce anything do to physical or mental blocks, their community would take care of them. Humans have done that for each other since before we could farm the land.
Totally! But the value of a person is not in their labor, and especially not in their work. That's the main point I'm driving home here.
Ugh, value, capitalism gets in everything. Virtue? That's a better wird. The virtue of a person does not exist entirely,bor even primarily, in their labor. Only their utility to a system lies primarily in that, which should only ever be a thing we make to enable human flourishing.
Where, please actually quote, exactly did I say anything about the measure of someone's virtue/value? I said we need a worker's world. I say we need it because owners hold back the worker's lives in bitter drudgery, and everyone would do better when they received recognition and compensation for their labors, rather than owners siphoning it. Here's a question for you: why are you so obsessed with the measure of a man? who is human and who is not, how we measure the value of a human being, how the humanity is observed. What is your ideology? Are you anarchist, ML, MLM, Juche, some mix? Even if you don't fully identify with one or another, give me an idea of what theories you subscribe to.
Again,all for the workers. I'm suggesting more inclusive language and ideas. It should not be a 'workers' world, but world without exploitation or (excessive? The current paradigm of personal?) ownership.
Most of the work I've done that mattered for more than five minutes was with people that had been thrown away by society and excluded from literally emergency rooms, you could set one of them outside a reported shooting and if the paramedics showed up before the cops, they would see them and probably just leave. A scared mostly useless kid who had read a lot of moral but not much explicitly political philosophy tossed out into the world. I ended up reading some theory later, but mostly I critically analyzed shit-mostly systems. I have fav philosophers, but not many favs who pitch particular politics. broadly speaking, partially from my time working with tech shit, I'm a principled illegalist. I tend to prefer looking at shit myself to trusting some dusty fuck who's been dead for centuries, and use them mostly as jumping off points instead of foundations. Neitzsche might be the exception, that one's in there pretty deep, fav philosopher, would absolutely go back in time to punch him in the face, might stop baby Hitler with adoption paperwork or something while I'm there IDK.
More recently I've been painfully confronted with the fact that nobody changes unless they want to, and they never seem to want to, contemporaneous with some major losses and trauma, so for the past couple years I dunno exactly what I believe, except that some people will get very angry if you tell them the truth or treat them with respect, and also literally everything is sometimes literally on fire.
Who are you and what do you believe? Because it sounds like you only asked this so you could know how to appeal to me.
I have at no point said people who aren't workers aren't persons or lose their humanity. The owner class really isn't made up of those incapable of working. However. lots of people in the working class are. Most people are able to, and in fact want to be productive in some capacity. Making art, cooking, cleaning, sex work, and emotional labor are all legitimate fields of work that contribute to society. lot of people are doing these things now and not being recognized for their efforts, who would be under communism. And it would be a lot easier to say to everyone at your factory who know exactly what your doing "I'm taking a month or two off, I'm feeling burnt out" than it is to say that to a boss who will replace you in a second. And for the small handful of people who genuinely are just completely unable to produce anything do to physical or mental blocks, their community would take care of them. Humans have done that for each other since before we could farm the land.
Totally! But the value of a person is not in their labor, and especially not in their work. That's the main point I'm driving home here.
Ugh, value, capitalism gets in everything. Virtue? That's a better wird. The virtue of a person does not exist entirely,bor even primarily, in their labor. Only their utility to a system lies primarily in that, which should only ever be a thing we make to enable human flourishing.
Where, please actually quote, exactly did I say anything about the measure of someone's virtue/value? I said we need a worker's world. I say we need it because owners hold back the worker's lives in bitter drudgery, and everyone would do better when they received recognition and compensation for their labors, rather than owners siphoning it. Here's a question for you: why are you so obsessed with the measure of a man? who is human and who is not, how we measure the value of a human being, how the humanity is observed. What is your ideology? Are you anarchist, ML, MLM, Juche, some mix? Even if you don't fully identify with one or another, give me an idea of what theories you subscribe to.
Again,all for the workers. I'm suggesting more inclusive language and ideas. It should not be a 'workers' world, but world without exploitation or (excessive? The current paradigm of personal?) ownership.
Most of the work I've done that mattered for more than five minutes was with people that had been thrown away by society and excluded from literally emergency rooms, you could set one of them outside a reported shooting and if the paramedics showed up before the cops, they would see them and probably just leave. A scared mostly useless kid who had read a lot of moral but not much explicitly political philosophy tossed out into the world. I ended up reading some theory later, but mostly I critically analyzed shit-mostly systems. I have fav philosophers, but not many favs who pitch particular politics. broadly speaking, partially from my time working with tech shit, I'm a principled illegalist. I tend to prefer looking at shit myself to trusting some dusty fuck who's been dead for centuries, and use them mostly as jumping off points instead of foundations. Neitzsche might be the exception, that one's in there pretty deep, fav philosopher, would absolutely go back in time to punch him in the face, might stop baby Hitler with adoption paperwork or something while I'm there IDK.
More recently I've been painfully confronted with the fact that nobody changes unless they want to, and they never seem to want to, contemporaneous with some major losses and trauma, so for the past couple years I dunno exactly what I believe, except that some people will get very angry if you tell them the truth or treat them with respect, and also literally everything is sometimes literally on fire.
Who are you and what do you believe? Because it sounds like you only asked this so you could know how to appeal to me.