The question is in bold at the end. It's better to eat your veggies first but...

———

Imagine it's January. Consider this imaginary list of Biden and the DC dems "accomplishments".

  • Abortion. Dem failure. They haven't really done anything on the federal level yet. By election day ~40% (or whatever the number is) of women won't have reproductive rights. It's possible that in June the GOP justices will ban abortion on a federal level.

  • The Supreme Court. Dem failure. They didn't pack the court. Instead they passed minor reforms that are total fucking bullshit. It's clear to anybody with a working brain that the GOP justices will be openly fucking us for decades. Stephen Breyer is 83. There are rumors he has had "medical treatment" but he refuses comment on such quotidian matters. Of course, when he dies - his replacement will be a GOP justice.

  • Protecting democracy. Dem failure. The For the People Act never got passed and never will get passed. By using a filibuster carve out - Biden and the dems passed a piddly version of the John Lewis Voting Rights Act. It's a joke. It's like putting up some sandbags instead of stopping a dam from failing and causing a catastrophic flood. By election day ~40% (or whatever the number is) of the electorate will face anti-democracy laws. The 2022 elections will be bad. 2024 will be a total horrorshow.

  • Protecting the climate. Dem failure. By using yet another fucking filibuster carve out - the dems passed a hollowed out version of the dem-only infrastructure bill. The proclaimed amount for climate is $550B. When grotesque pork like the gimmes to the energy sector are subtracted - the number falls to a bit over $500B. Another piddly number.

———

In this context - consider the following convo in r/politics

Leftist: "Why should I vote for the democrats in the elections?"

Lib: "That's so stupid that I won't even answer. Do you care about democracy? Do you care about anything? You have to vote democrat."

Leftist: The leftist lists those four bullet points (and more?) and says "To reiterate: Why should I vote for the democrats in the elections? All they do is fail. Use your words or - hell - use somebody else's words (give me a link to an article) that answers my question."

The liberal links to an article by some idiot "thinker" lib like Jonathan Chait. The article is for voters disheartened, disillusioned, and disgusted with the democrats and it has an "undeniable" list of reasons that we all gotta vote for the democrats. What sort of arguments does that article make?

  • andys_nuts [none/use name]
    ·
    3 years ago

    There is something to be gained by that, so we should simply make that argument in exactly the words you just did. Making a big deal about not voting doesn't accomplish that -- it derails the conversation into them attempting to shame you into voting. Say "yeah, I'm voting" -- you can lie! -- and then move on to talking about how little can be accomplished through our current electoral process.