A clear majority of the British public now believes Brexit has been bad for the UK economy, has driven up prices in shops, and has hampered government attempts to control immigration, according to a landmark poll by Opinium to mark the third anniversary of the UK fully leaving the EU single market and customs unions.

The survey of more than 2,000 UK voters also finds strikingly low numbers of people who believe that Brexit has been of benefit to them or the country.

  • IbnLemmy@feddit.uk
    ·
    9 months ago

    Britons voted for it, now they think it's completely failed. I don't know guys, but there some questions that we should just not ask Britons!!?

    Personally voted against Brexit, but always believed it should never have even gone to a referendum. We are a parliamentary democracy and parliament should have decided.

    • HobbitFoot @thelemmy.club
      ·
      9 months ago

      The problem is that it was an advisory vote and it is should have been handled by initially deciding a negotiating position.

      Leaving the EU meant a lot of different things and the approximate idea of implementation should have been decided on before leaving.

      • tal@lemmy.today
        ·
        9 months ago

        The problem is that it was an advisory vote

        This is sometimes raised, but is misleading. The only reason it was legally advisory is because in the British system of government, the UK cannot bind Parliament; the House of Commons can override anything else.

        In the system of government in some countries, the option for a meaningful legal difference between two types of referendum exists.

        The British government had been explicit that what the British public voted for would be implemented; this is the closest analog to a binding referendum. Had they simply wanted to request the advice of the public, it would have been announced that they would take the outcome under consideration.

        This is not to say that having that referendum was s good idea. It is just to say that the binding/advisory nature is really a property of the British system of government, not to indicate that the intent was to merely take the public's vote as advice.

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      ·
      9 months ago

      We are a parliamentary democracy and parliament should have decided.

      "How dare those dirty proles be given a choice"

      • trebuchet@lemmy.ml
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yup, you're a real hero with your populism. Look how great that turned out.

        People these days treat democracy like a damned religion instead of a system of governance. Turns out though that complex decisions often benefit from expertise instead of letting the lowest common denominator decide.

    • Damage@feddit.it
      ·
      9 months ago

      We are a parliamentary democracy and parliament should have decided.

      It was decided by the political class, otherwise it wouldn't have happened. With such a slim margin they could have said "oh well, it's practically 50-50, it's wiser to maintain the status quo".