I'm thinking something less obvious, like "constructivism". Essentialist philosophies give rise to reactionary politics; constructivist philosophies give rise to progressive politics.
When you see everything as an emergent composition, and you see patterns rather than mere physical beings, and you see all sentient experience connected by the same kind of consciousness, how could you not be a socialist?
I'm thinking something less obvious, like "constructivism". Essentialist philosophies give rise to reactionary politics; constructivist philosophies give rise to progressive politics.
When you see everything as an emergent composition, and you see patterns rather than mere physical beings, and you see all sentient experience connected by the same kind of consciousness, how could you not be a socialist?
Yeah, CoDM is too on the nose, but I feel what you're saying.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator