I see they're trying to discredit the case against Israel by trying to make it seem like South Africa doesn't have any actual credible hard evidence (which they do) and that they're just running on emotions, but like...thousands of Palestinians dead would and should make anyone angry so what's that even supposed to imply?
For some reason around 2012ish I think? The internet collectively decided that if you express anything other than cold hard facts and logic™ when presenting your argument, you're automatically wrong, because if you care about something that means you're no longer being objective.
I see they're trying to discredit the case against Israel by trying to make it seem like South Africa doesn't have any actual credible hard evidence (which they do) and that they're just running on emotions, but like...thousands of Palestinians dead would and should make anyone angry so what's that even supposed to imply?
For some reason around 2012ish I think? The internet collectively decided that if you express anything other than cold hard facts and logic™ when presenting your argument, you're automatically wrong, because if you care about something that means you're no longer being objective.
Honestly I feel like an argument has more weight to it when you're not just angry, you're absolutely correct about it.