i also can't help but think it's a reverse psychology media tactic, trying to push apoliticals to the right by creating something to be defensive about.
"what!? who told you antiwork was alt-right? that can't be true"
"if antiwork is alt-right, then everyone's alt-right"
"if the libtard media keep insisting antiwork is alt-right, maybe the alt-right is good actually? i should check out some of their material"
it doesn't have to be logically consistent, the vague implications and iffy logic are what makes it work
:bait:
i also can't help but think it's a reverse psychology media tactic, trying to push apoliticals to the right by creating something to be defensive about.
"what!? who told you antiwork was alt-right? that can't be true"
"if antiwork is alt-right, then everyone's alt-right"
"if the libtard media keep insisting antiwork is alt-right, maybe the alt-right is good actually? i should check out some of their material"
it doesn't have to be logically consistent, the vague implications and iffy logic are what makes it work