• Does_KJU_Have_Drip [none/use name]
        ·
        3 years ago

        Anarcholib who bans tankies and makes a mockery out of the left: defend her honor!!

        Communist who points out how dumb this is: wall

          • Does_KJU_Have_Drip [none/use name]
            ·
            3 years ago

            Nowhere did I say anything transphobic or anti-trans in any way. I merely criticized this woman’s embarrassing display, and then made a secondary criticism of this website’s inability to accept the first criticism

            Both of my critiques are right and you know it and it’s why you all got so mad

            • DragonNest_Aidit [they/them,use name]
              ·
              3 years ago

              You're literally the only one who brought up her trans-ness out of nowhere as an attack and insinuates that this site didn't shit on her harder because we're pro trans and thus have to defend her because of that.

              How stupid do you think we are? Do you seriously think we're unfamiliar with this tactic?

              Just fuckoff to whatever shitty sub:reddit-logo: or discord you hangs out and tell us you owned us idpol sjws epic style.

              • Does_KJU_Have_Drip [none/use name]
                ·
                3 years ago

                I didn’t use her trans-ness as an attack against her. I clearly criticized her for tactical errors, sectarianism and general failure at being a spokesperson.

                • DragonNest_Aidit [they/them,use name]
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  Then why this:

                  I swear you all are going to circle the wagons here and defend a sex pest sectarian blunder just because she is trans. Keep walking into these blunders, it’s clear you don’t really ever want to win if you defend this

                  And this

                  The more you circle the wagons and defend, the more closely they will be tied to being representative of the trans community

                  If you had just stopped at the dog walker part your argument would be viewed more in good faith and instead of this bullshit we would have a more productive discussion about what constitutes as "labor".

                  But instead you brought up transgenderism as something of a liability. That it "blinds" us from seeing the truth and engages in identity politic. This is a very typical tactic, social justice is bad because it distracts people from class struggle or something.

                  Again, just go ahead and take your screenshots and post it in stupidpol spaces. Have a laugh with all the reactionaries you welcome there. If you're not the one doing it then somebody else will so might as well claim your fake internet points.

                  • Does_KJU_Have_Drip [none/use name]
                    ·
                    3 years ago

                    It’s not a liability and none of my critiques of Doreen were due to her gender or trans status. They were valid critiques of tactical failure.

                    My point is that on this site, trans-ness is not a liability - in fact it acts as an impenetrable shield that will get people to start telling communists to go to the wall over completely legitimate criticisms. It causes you to act irrationally and defend and indefensible person and situation when you should be dunking instead

            • MaeBorowski [she/her]
              ·
              3 years ago

              This whole argument is so frustrating. I agree that you never said anything transphobic and anyone condemning you for it is wrong. But on that same note, "this website" is not defending an obviously unprepared, unqualified lib because she is trans.

        • HodgePodge [love/loves]
          ·
          3 years ago

          Everyone: "She's a radlib who LARPed too close to the sun, just don't fucking misgender her."

          You, apparently: "omg y r u defending her!?"

          :stfu-terf: