:19::84:

  • Dingdangdog [he/him,comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I'd wager you're just not attracted to women if you don't find that woman hot as hell

    Which is fine obviously.

    But like God damn dude I'd be full :awooga:

    • hauntologist [comrade/them,he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      Like everyone has their preferences and that's fine, whatever. But if your appreciation for sexual attractiveness is so horrifyingly policed by what is perceived to be socially attractive at some given point in time, within some given culture, that you don't find this person who is utterly gorgeous by almost every metric other than that she's slightly overweight.... you have a sociological pathology imo. Beauty is subjective. Sexual attractiveness is subjective. But there are certain common threads and she meets nearly all of them. The fact that this woman doesn't meet one very highly specific metric of current social attractiveness is enough for this fucking ghoul scumbag grifter loser Peterson to write her off as not attractive to anyone but for... fucking authoritarisnism.. (WHAT THE ACTUAL FUCK?!?!) I just... I can't. It's just sickening. It's ideological body shaming fascism. Please someone tell me if my take is bad because I feel like I can't even fully comprehend all the layers of bullshit here.

          • MerryChristmas [any]
            ·
            2 years ago

            The first time I heard that word was when everyone cared about American Idol for some reason and I'm just now realizing that it doesn't mean "similar in appearance to that guy Ruben from American Idol." He was a bigger guy and I guess I heard someone describe him that way once?

        • hauntologist [comrade/them,he/him]
          ·
          2 years ago

          yeah, I think she's pretty much perfect in my personal subjective book, I'm just trying to latch on to and identify whatever that shitheel pill popping loser Peterson has a problem with.