This might not be worthy of this community, it's what I've got. I think this screenshot still looks alright, though. Hope you enjoy.

  • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
    ·
    6 months ago

    I switched over to Nobara, from Garuda, on my desktop. I was using Nobara because I have a M$ Surface Pro 4, and wanted a distro with the linux-surface stuff baked into the kernel, what with being lazy and all.
    Thinking I might switch back to Garuda for my DT pc, just liked it better. Nobara runs most everything I need it to fine. Just having the same distro on a load of different devices is a bit dull.

    • jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org
      ·
      6 months ago

      I went from Nobara to Garuda. My biggest concern was that it was maintained by one (very awesome) dude. It's generally great. I decided to go with Garuda because I like the workflow of Arch but didn't want to spend a day setting it up. Also, I gained some noticeable performance on the few games I play.

      • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
        ·
        6 months ago

        I didn't notice any performance changes in gaming myself, with the one exception of the Metro games, which had really bad screen tearing. That said I have an NVIDIA gfx card sooooo......

        Definitely having just G-eggroll as the sole maintainer of Nobara is a bit worrying. The reason I'm switching back to Garuda is definitely about workload of Arch over Fedora. I'm also a big fan of not spending 8hrs manually configuring Arch.