• yuritopia [any]
    ·
    2 years ago

    Lmao I think I started this “struggle session”, or at least one with the same topic. I called Goblin Slayer gross and disgusting, and some treat defender tried to debate lord.

    As for the anime being “progressive”, I remember they tried to argue that it represents class struggle because in the anime the nobles didn’t care about the peasants, or some other contrived bullshit that demonstrated a complete nonunderstanding of what class struggle is. It was a kneejerk reaction to the poster’s precious treat getting badmouthed.

    • AssortedBiscuits [they/them]
      ·
      2 years ago

      The whole premise of that show is fascist. Unless there's some backstory that I'm unaware of where the goblins are waging a national liberation struggle against humans encroaching on their indigenous lands, it's just the usual "Asiatic locust swarm horde in human form that only knows how to rape and pillage" fascist trope, except with green humanoids instead of (European) humans.

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        Even if one could somehow set aside all the hog feeding in the first episode and thecryptofascist genocide apologia in Goblin Slayer, the "these nobles are bad actually" trope is very tired old :LIB: cliche when it's usually seen, especially when the implied subtext is "if only we had better nobles, ah well. Revolutions are silly and/or hypocritical and/or just as bad as the bad nobles and/or doomed to fail!"

        Gambo's setting also is pretty much that. I don't buy the "this is actually leftist because it shows nobles as bad actually" take because the only alternatives or prospects of change are shown as silly or hypocritical or otherwise doomed to fail, and there was a good monarch this one time that the setting and its narrative voice express nostalgia for on top of that. :sus-soviet: