1. The authors of this book are to be defined as follows: indecent and immoral (while Disney’s world is pure); hyper-complicated and hyper-sophisticated (while Walt is simple, open and sincere); members of a sinister elite (while Disney is the most popular man in the world); political agitators (while Disney is non-partisan, above politics); calculating and embittered (while Walt D. is spontaneous, emotional, loves to laugh and make laughter); subverters of youth and domestic peace (while W. D. teaches respect for parents, love of one’s fellows and protection of the weak); unpatriotic and antagonistic to the national spirit (while Mr Disney, being international, represents the best and dearest of our native traditions); and finally, cultivators of “Marxism-fiction,” a theory imported from abroad by “wicked foreigners” (while Unca Walt is against exploitation and promotes the classless society of the future).
  1. Next, the authors of this book are to be accused of the very lowest of crimes: of daring to raise doubts about the child’s imagination, that is, O horror!, to question the right of children to have a literature of their own, which interprets them so well, and is created on their behalf.
  1. FINALLY, TO EXPEL SOMEONE FROM THE DISNEYLAND CLUB, ACCUSE HIM REPEATEDLY OF TRYING TO BRAINWASH CHILDREN WITH THE DOCTRINE OF COLORLESS SOCIAL REALISM, IMPOSED BY POLITICAL COMMISSARS.

Even though the book was written in the context of Disney comics and how it was used to propagandize the Chilean society, (with a sobering introduction in the 2018 by author who realized that it all leads up the 1973 coup), I'm sure any leftist with any kind of interaction with media analysis and fandoms could recognize these "symptoms" among mainsteam media discussions; in particular when the dread issue of POLITICS IN FICTION came to play.