Yuritopiaposadism [none/use name] to technology • 5 months agoElon Musk Is Still Trying to Get Other Carmakers to License "Full Self-Driving," But Not a Single One Has Taken Him Up On Itexternal-linkmessage-square15 fedilinkarrow-up145
arrow-up145external-linkElon Musk Is Still Trying to Get Other Carmakers to License "Full Self-Driving," But Not a Single One Has Taken Him Up On ItYuritopiaposadism [none/use name] to technology • 5 months agomessage-square15 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareTabitha ☢️[she/her]hexbear11·5 months agoNow I'm curious, was the original purpose of releasing "Full Self-Driving" 20 years before it was safe a merely a ploy to lock in trade mark rights? link
minus-squaredat_math [they/them]hexbear8·5 months ago 20 years before it was safe I think you're giving elon and other carbrains way too much credit here. We don't have any definitive proof that this kind of technology can be made safe on roads as we know them today, and there is ample evidence to suspect that this kind of problem is not solvable with modern techniques. link
minus-squareJohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]hexbear6·5 months agoit would be quite a bit safer with lidar but is such a piece of shit his cars don't use it. "full self-driving" is nowhere near "full" and is only vaguely self-driving and it should be illegal to call it that. link
minus-squaredat_math [they/them]hexbear4·5 months ago it would be quite a bit safer with lidar Yeah, but it would still fail when the lidar gets "adversarially attacked" by a fucking shadow moving in just the wrong way "full self-driving" is nowhere near "full" and is only vaguely self-driving and it should be illegal to call it that. 100% agreed link
Now I'm curious, was the original purpose of releasing "Full Self-Driving" 20 years before it was safe a merely a ploy to lock in trade mark rights?
I think you're giving elon and other carbrains way too much credit here. We don't have any definitive proof that this kind of technology can be made safe on roads as we know them today, and there is ample evidence to suspect that this kind of problem is not solvable with modern techniques.
it would be quite a bit safer with lidar but
is such a piece of shit his cars don't use it.
"full self-driving" is nowhere near "full" and is only vaguely self-driving and it should be illegal to call it that.
Yeah, but it would still fail when the lidar gets "adversarially attacked" by a fucking shadow moving in just the wrong way
100% agreed