it's a process that well predates the Medicis, though. If Italy is the birthplace of mercantilism, then it happened in like the 1100s, when they started to dominate mediterranean trade. it's a major reason for the fall of the byzantines, in that they let the Italians handle all their trade, which led to a lot of latins in contantinople, to them being massacred and then to 1204.
If only the Medicis wrote down what year they invented capitalism, and who did it (probably someone named Capitalismo Medici)
Also I meant more the normalizing of conventions that are cornerstones of finance today. As I understand it the interpretation of usury started relaxing as corruption set into the Church and little "gifts" to church accounts were expected, based on a percentage of the deposited funds, but it definitely wasn't interest, no sir, no need to tell Jesus. Eventually it became a non-issue, and now interest-based debt and lending is just a feature of the system that the economies of entire nations rest upon to assert their supremacy.
I could be wrong though, I ain't got no degree in bankology
Italian domination of mediterranean trade means there's more need for capital, that leads to inventing new forms of financing, this financing drives a need for new markets, this drive for new markets leads to italians expeditions to America and around Africa. They're doing that as contractors for other states though, as Italy both doesn't have a presence in atlantic and is the battleground for other powers rather than a state in of itself.
it's a process that well predates the Medicis, though. If Italy is the birthplace of mercantilism, then it happened in like the 1100s, when they started to dominate mediterranean trade. it's a major reason for the fall of the byzantines, in that they let the Italians handle all their trade, which led to a lot of latins in contantinople, to them being massacred and then to 1204.
If only the Medicis wrote down what year they invented capitalism, and who did it (probably someone named Capitalismo Medici)
Also I meant more the normalizing of conventions that are cornerstones of finance today. As I understand it the interpretation of usury started relaxing as corruption set into the Church and little "gifts" to church accounts were expected, based on a percentage of the deposited funds, but it definitely wasn't interest, no sir, no need to tell Jesus. Eventually it became a non-issue, and now interest-based debt and lending is just a feature of the system that the economies of entire nations rest upon to assert their supremacy.
I could be wrong though, I ain't got no degree in bankology
Well, it's presumably an iterative process.
Italian domination of mediterranean trade means there's more need for capital, that leads to inventing new forms of financing, this financing drives a need for new markets, this drive for new markets leads to italians expeditions to America and around Africa. They're doing that as contractors for other states though, as Italy both doesn't have a presence in atlantic and is the battleground for other powers rather than a state in of itself.