What were the material differences such that the USSR was able to use central planning to develop their economy into a superpower, while the Chinese economy struggled to alleviate poverty without seeking foreign investment?

(I get that the question presupposes legitimacy of the Deng reforms and I am too much of an ignoramus to argue one or the other, so if you think the question is a fundamentally incorrect one I'm interested to know why too)

  • Alaskaball [comrade/them]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    The Russian Empire up to its collapse did have a small developing industrial sector that was dragging it out of feudalism. Urban and industrial centers were developing along similar lines as the early British industrial revolution in terms of industrial capacity and bourgeois exploitation.

    Contrary to the other industrialized nations, tsarist Russians capitalist class was quite small and not capable enough of sustaining the kind of industrialization that was happening and so relied heavily on Foreign investors and speculators to fund the industrialization of the Russian Empire. This meant there were British oil rigs in Baku, French coal mines in the donbass, American banks in petrograd, etc. It was a whole international financial capitalist garden of eden in terms of new markets opening up to parasite the peoples wealth out of their veins.

    Contrary to that, China at the same period was rather too unstable for the major financial investment and industrialist development the tsarist empire experienced, as there were famines, opium crisis, civil wars, and the schisming of the Chinese empire altogether into regional warlords. Throw in as well how China was seen as a literal treasure chest to be looted by the imperialist powers up to ww2, and you can see why it's simpler if rather reductive to say that China was underdeveloped and overexploited.

      • Alaskaball [comrade/them]
        ·
        2 years ago

        I can't really comment on any of that since I've read nothing on the subject so I'll take your word on it.

          • Alaskaball [comrade/them]
            ·
            2 years ago

            I'd say your speculation and opinions are based off of your own studies in that area, so it would stand on much firmer ground than any assertion I could make on the PRC's economic history.

      • solaranus
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        deleted by creator