• FuckyWucky [none/use name]
    ·
    2 years ago

    because airplane building (in large scale) is very 'capital intensive' and requires the country to have a technical know-how to do it.

    • 7bicycles [he/him]
      ·
      2 years ago

      neither of those points seem like a huge challenge to something like the USSR or China

      • FuckyWucky [none/use name]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        i mean yea, USSR did manage to build planes relatively early but what I meant was (like the other person mentioned) outside Airbus/Boeing there aren't many companies building commercial planes because of how risky and capital intensive it is.

        being able to domestically manufacture such stuff is very important to prevent dependence on imports and protect against potential embargoes.

        same thing with computer chips. there is a reason why China isn't there yet in terms of competing with the west on chip manufacturing. it requires a shit ton investment in equipment, technology, infrastructure and takes a very long time especially with the west guarding their IP.

        Capitalists don't like making such investments unless they absolutely have to (eg privately owned rail infrastructure in the U.S.). They like short term profits which is why there won't be much chip production happening in India anytime soon.

        • daisy
          ·
          2 years ago

          it requires a shit ton investment in equipment, technology, infrastructure and takes a very long time especially with the west guarding their IP.

          Fortunately the Chinese government is pushing hard for domestic adoption and production of RISC-V. This is an open-source, royalty-free CPU reference design that competes largely with ARM. NASA is also adopting it as their standard architecture for space-based computers for decades to come, as a way to prevent vendor lock-in. They want spacecraft computers to be much more modular.