• JuneFall [none/use name]
    ·
    1 year ago

    CW
    So just to be clear, every few seconds a screenshot of a minors phone, will be sent to adults. Which will basically show "everything" shown on the device, including selfies, but also just looking into the camera app of the 14 yo, their searches for underwear, puberty related questions in regards to period, sex, contraceptions and their chats with other minors. Some of whom might as well be below the age of 14.

    It does feel more invasive especially against the family than most had in mind when they talked about total control in 1980.

  • Leper_Messiah [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Several legal experts expressed concern about the monitoring conditions imposed by the judge in Hannah’s husband’s case. But Phyllis Emerick, the chief deputy public defender in Monroe County, argues that because Hannah’s husband and his family consented to the surveillance, they gave up their rights to privacy. “He agreed that he would not access electronic devices in his household in exchange for release,” she says. “It was the family’s choice to continue living with him.”

    """Public defender"""

    And ofc it was some NSA ghoul who developed & sold this panopticon bullshit

    • JuneFall [none/use name]
      ·
      1 year ago

      It was the family’s choice to continue living with him

      and

      Hannah’s husband and his family consented to the surveillance

      Including 14yos.

      I wonder how explicit that consent would have to be. Could I for example do a website for cheating on your spouse that targets senators and have them consent that everything in their houses gets send to me every other second?

  • Socialcreditscorr [they/them,she/her]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    "In the authoritarian hellscape that is North Korea, if you are suspected of commiting a crime they track your entire family and punish you for every crime they commit afterwards." :joker-amerikkklap: :amerikkka:

  • SovietyWoomy [any]
    ·
    1 year ago

    People who were never accused or convicted of a crime, including minors, had to install draconian surveillance software on their devices despite the software's terms of service that explicitly stating it should not be used this way. As if that's not bad enough, the family had to pay the subscription cost. :amerikkka:

    • Fuckass
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

      • ssjmarx [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        paying for your own parole is standard operating procedure in the United States - and if you have trouble affording all the fees then it's back to prison.

      • LaGG_3 [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you read the article, the man is back in jail and the family is afraid stop paying the subscription cost. :amerikkka:

  • SerLava [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Nothing more American than suspecting someone is a pedo and then arresting them on the suspicion of looking at normal porn of adults

    • Fuckass
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      deleted by creator

  • Fuckass
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

  • ssjmarx [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    Covenant Eyes

    oh shit I first heard about this in that Netflix documentary about that cult that had a reality show.