sgtnasty@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agoMy holy trinity of trustimagemessage-square27 fedilinkarrow-up1163file-text
arrow-up1163imageMy holy trinity of trustsgtnasty@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square27 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareGVasco@discuss.tchncs.dehexbear3·1 year agoI might swap bitwarden by passbolt as it uses a more recent programming stack, although vaultwarden looks to be a good alternative too. linkfedilink
minus-squarefox [comrade/them]hexbear2·1 year agoDoes a more recent stack translate to any real benefits? link
minus-squareapt_install_coffee@lemmy.mlhexbear1·1 year agoNot necessarily, plenty of good programs written in C89 for example. With something that is heavily library dependent, having a more recent development stack may mean better maintained libraries but definitely not a sure thing. linkfedilink
I might swap bitwarden by passbolt as it uses a more recent programming stack, although vaultwarden looks to be a good alternative too.
Does a more recent stack translate to any real benefits?
Not necessarily, plenty of good programs written in C89 for example.
With something that is heavily library dependent, having a more recent development stack may mean better maintained libraries but definitely not a sure thing.