https://futurism.com/the-byte/government-ai-worse-summarizing

The upshot: these AI summaries were so bad that the assessors agreed that using them could require more work down the line, because of the amount of fact-checking they require. If that's the case, then the purported upsides of using the technology — cost-cutting and time-saving — are seriously called into question.

        • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]
          ·
          3 months ago

          I've been thinking about this comment a lot over the last couple of days. I do my research in agriculture and food systems so I've had a lot of exposure to the "future is rural" philosophy, but it's mainly in the context of climate change. It seems like anyone talking sense about the trajectory our society is on is quietly buying small plots of land for smallholder agriculture or posting about how farms are probably going to stop supplying food systems and start focusing on meeting their own needs as conditions get less hospitable. It's interesting to consider that there's a convergent response emerging as a result of automation.

          Meanwhile I'm sitting here on my small expensive urban plot that couldn't sustain more than some summer vegetables because I thought I'd get bored doing actual agriculture blob-no-thoughts

    • UlyssesT
      ·
      edit-2
      21 days ago

      deleted by creator

        • UlyssesT
          ·
          edit-2
          21 days ago

          deleted by creator

            • UlyssesT
              ·
              edit-2
              21 days ago

              deleted by creator

                • UlyssesT
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  21 days ago

                  deleted by creator

                    • UlyssesT
                      ·
                      edit-2
                      21 days ago

                      deleted by creator