I could go on and on about Adrian Zenz, his terrible methodologies; about terrorist groups trained by Isis and utilized by American for creating unrest in Xinjiang; stats about real population numbers in Xinjiang; about differences between American and Chinese anti-terror efforts regarding radical islamic terror groups; about infrastructure building in the area, investment by China; about the number of mosques per capita; about the preservation of regional identity that Xi is working towards; etc. Etc.

But, regardless, just saying that I don't believe that there is religious persecution in Xinjiang means, in their eyes, that I don't care about our Muslim brothers and sisters.

It's similar to talking about Hong Kong.

Libs use these places as tools to spread liberalism, so caring about the actual policies, people, and reality is a disadvantage to conversation.

How can I approach these subjects?

  • abdul [none/use name]
    ·
    4 years ago

    The underlying premise here is broken, as the PRC doesnt care about whether you’ve been “radicalized” or not. Simply being related to Muslims or having a beard is enough to get disappeared.

    Regardless. You’re worried about salafists but the KSA is run by wahabbists and they have no problem with what China is doing, what does that tell you?

    The solution to terrorism isn’t to lock up every person you see that might be Muslim. It’s to lock up the people engaging in terrorism and leave innocent people alone.