• pH3ra@lemmy.ml
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It's just my opinion (since it's not in the article) but a thing that makes Gnome and Libadwaita a "modern design" is the fact that the production behind it tries to bridge the gap between a "mouse and keyboard" and a "touch screen" workflow.
    None of the other DEs come even close to Gnome when used on a tablet

    • zeus ⁧ ⁧ 𓆩🗲𓆪@lemm.ee
      ·
      1 year ago

      meh, subjectively i find that creates a "worst of both worlds" situation. but this comment was more about the futility of the development time that went into this specific feature

      • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        this comment was more about the futility of the development time that went into this specific feature

        yeah sorry, I should have been more specific with my answer: features like this are supposed to help you in a touch screen situation or in general with smaller screens.
        When the window is resized under a certain size, the left panel becomes hidden and with it part of the top bar, to make it less cluttered and confusing.

        • zeus ⁧ ⁧ 𓆩🗲𓆪@lemm.ee
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          but ...surely you could just do the same thing with the old design? artist's rendition:

          *removed externally hosted image*

          in fact, now i look at it, it makes them look even more similar once i collapse the sidebar

          • pH3ra@lemmy.ml
            ·
            1 year ago

            The difference is minimal, in the newer version you have 1 less element when the sidebar is collapsed (the hamburger menu).
            Generally speaking Gnome 44 is already well optimized, 45 is going to be a more "tweaks and small improvements" kind of update rather than a big design changes

    • thepoaster@lemmy.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      Agreed, I'm not an expert, kind of new to linux, but I could see being very comfortable on a Gnome based tablet.