56k votes for Jo, 15k difference between D and R, means that a 63% 37% voting pattern would've made the difference in assumption of total transference. More likely is that a few people would've been non voters. If we add that to consideration the voting pattern would've to be something even more skewed, like 70% to 30%.
That is not to be expected with the makeup of the voting population for the actual voting block (e.g. not the non-voting block).
More easily to win Michigan would've been driving out the vote in general and targeting non-voters. This wasn't done for reasons this board talked more often about.
Though this election the voting participation was comparably high.
56k votes for Jo, 15k difference between D and R, means that a 63% 37% voting pattern would've made the difference in assumption of total transference. More likely is that a few people would've been non voters. If we add that to consideration the voting pattern would've to be something even more skewed, like 70% to 30%. That is not to be expected with the makeup of the voting population for the actual voting block (e.g. not the non-voting block).
More easily to win Michigan would've been driving out the vote in general and targeting non-voters. This wasn't done for reasons this board talked more often about. Though this election the voting participation was comparably high.