BillyMays [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 4 years agoCOMM_ORGANISER_BOTmessage-squaremessage-square200 fedilinkarrow-up194file-text
arrow-up167message-squareCOMM_ORGANISER_BOTBillyMays [he/him] to the_dunk_tank • 4 years agomessage-square200 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareBrigador [none/use name,they/them]hexbear23arrow-down3·edit-24 years agodeleted by creator link
minus-squareWisp [fae/faer, any]hexbear20·4 years agoI think the majority of users for any site are lurkers link
minus-squareAwoo [she/her]hexbear21·edit-24 years agoThis. There is a commonly known 90-9-1 rule in community management. I've seen this trend play out on every single community I've ever been involved with on the side where you can see the data. link
minus-squarea_blanqui_slate [none/use name, any]hexbear12·4 years agoIf we ban posts and comments like I've been saying we need to we can widely expand the userbase that engages fully with the site. link
deleted by creator
I think the majority of users for any site are lurkers
This. There is a commonly known 90-9-1 rule in community management. I've seen this trend play out on every single community I've ever been involved with on the side where you can see the data.
If we ban posts and comments like I've been saying we need to we can widely expand the userbase that engages fully with the site.
Didn't Digg try that to recover their site?