• AliceBToklas [she/her]
        ·
        4 years ago

        80 years is probably not enough to develop fusion... But Thorium reactors were built as early as the 60s

        • Fourny [he/him,comrade/them]
          ·
          4 years ago

          I agree that thorium is a good option. I’m a fan of the LFTR designs. But if we are willing to invest in research I feel like 80 years is more than enough time to get working fusion power generation.

          • AliceBToklas [she/her]
            ·
            4 years ago

            idk, the tokamak folks have been saying they're super close to energy positive reactor designs but they've been saying that for over 20 years and are still nowhere near energy positive and are still usually working with fission byproducts anyways. I think fusion is a great thing to keep researching but it's just far enough away that we need to focus more on fission for energy production, partially just because more experience in fission reactors on an economic and operations level will prepare us better for when fusion reactors are more closely within grasp.

    • T_Doug [he/him]
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 years ago

      It's also enough time to develop any sort of theoretically better battery technology that would allow for us to run our power grid solely on renewables.

      If we assume technological innovation, things get a lot easier.

      • Fakename_Bill [he/him]
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        Exactly, nuclear is the only way to completely kick fossil fuels quickly. Developing a replacement for uranium fission can come later.