Permanently Deleted

        • marxdude69 [none/use name]
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          I'm saying that it's not really an interpretation at all since it doesn't quote his works or really discuss them.

            • marxdude69 [none/use name]
              ·
              edit-2
              4 years ago

              Yes, that seems pretty inaccurate to me. To show that it is accurate you need to find quotes to support your assertion. This is not being 'obtuse' - this is the basics of making a properly Marxist analysis.

                • marxdude69 [none/use name]
                  ·
                  4 years ago

                  It says "mythology of the white proletariat" - i.e. we've been lied to about the history of white workers in USA. You can't seem to find more any evidence for your assertion besides the title of the book - I assume that's where you stopped reading.