What happens if Australia votes No to the Voice referendum? No-one has articulated a plan B
www.abc.net.au
If the Voice isn't the solution, as Peter Dutton argues, what is? How will Australia tackle Indigenous disadvantage if the majority vote No? Given the polls all suggest a No vote is the most likely outcome, the answer is surprisingly unclear, writes David Speers.
    • Ijustdoeyes@aussie.zone
      ·
      1 年前

      He was banking on a senate seat, but shit himself in the foot by saying the quiet part loud about a treaty

  • Ilandar@aussie.zone
    ·
    1 年前

    The idea that anyone would genuinely believe that a single person can magically fix all these problems by themselves is just painfully stupid.

  • Minarble@aussie.zone
    ·
    1 年前

    The Voice and audits are complimentary.

    One of the first orders of business of the Voice would be to request a full audit on spending so they have a baseline and better understanding of where the money is going so they can identify ineffective programs and redirect it to where it needs to go.

    Audits are already done regularity anyway 20 or so while Dutton was in Government.

    The problem with audits is they are done to show you are complying with the management intent.

    If the intent is misdirected and ineffectual you can still get 100% in an audit because you did what you said you would do and wasted the money exactly correctly.

    The Voice is the way to get the money used efficiently and effectively in the first place.

  • Dale Kerrigan [bot]@aussie.zoneMB
    ·
    1 年前

    Hey, just a little nudge, if you’re keen to chat about the Voice to Parliament, we’ve got this corker of a megathread where we can all have a good chinwag in one spot. But if you’re not up for that, no worries, it’s business as usual. Gotta keep things fair dinkum!