• DoiDoi [comrade/them, he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    being extremely obnoxious about linguistics (wikipedia pages and arguing over descriptive vs prescriptive only) was one of the defining characteristics of early reddit comment sections. That shit still sets off my alarm bells lol

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nietzsche gets a lot of flack for his obnoxious followers

        Evergreen comic: https://existentialcomics.com/comic/125

    • UlyssesT [he/him]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I chose linguistics as my example of autodidactical solipsistic bullshit because of experience with the type.

      EDIT: Disclaimer: I'm didn't intend to knock Chomsky's linguistics expertise; I had used an emoji about him because I mentioned linguistics, but now I see how that can be taken as saying he wasn't qualified as a linguist, which wasn't my intention so I removed the emoji. That said, he can be criticized for other reasons epstein

      • usernamesaredifficul [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        that's not quite fair whatever you think about Chomsky politically his work on linguistics is impressive.

        Richard Dawkins is a knob but he still does know about biology

        • UlyssesT [he/him]
          ·
          1 year ago

          I wasn't actually intending to knock Chomsky in that way there, only posting the emoji because "linguistics" reference and associations because hehe emoji.

          That said, his "none of your damn business" response to epstein questions was very sus.

            • UlyssesT [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              I had no intention of knocking his academic chops there. Academic... chopsky? kelly chompsky