WhyEssEff [she/her]M to finance • edit-24 years ago*Permanently Deleted*trashexternal-linkmessage-square40 fedilinkarrow-up166file-text
arrow-up166external-link*Permanently Deleted*trashWhyEssEff [she/her]M to finance • edit-24 years agomessage-square40 Commentsfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareDasKarlBarx [he/him,comrade/them]hexbear7·4 years agoI would say if the person's found guilty of whatever they were accused of, if they've doxxed themselves, or I'd they're a public figure. But I'm not media czar and this is pretty half baked. link
minus-squareCarlTheRedditor [he/him]hexbear5·4 years agoFair. I just think that there's a public interest in knowing who DFV is. His actions are indisputably newsworthy and I think that uncovering the identity of people whose actions are newsworthy is a legitimate thing for journalists to do. link
minus-squareDasKarlBarx [he/him,comrade/them]hexbear4·4 years agoYeah I mean this case specifically he doxxed himself. He did a interview with the WSJ and have his name & city so he's out there at this point. I'm just speaking more of media in general. link
I would say if the person's found guilty of whatever they were accused of, if they've doxxed themselves, or I'd they're a public figure.
But I'm not media czar and this is pretty half baked.
Fair.
I just think that there's a public interest in knowing who DFV is. His actions are indisputably newsworthy and I think that uncovering the identity of people whose actions are newsworthy is a legitimate thing for journalists to do.
Yeah I mean this case specifically he doxxed himself. He did a interview with the WSJ and have his name & city so he's out there at this point.
I'm just speaking more of media in general.