It's being called "trust-based philanthropy". The fact that this is so rare and subversive should cure libs of their idea that charity is selfless and not just another vector for the wealthy to exert control.
It's being called "trust-based philanthropy". The fact that this is so rare and subversive should cure libs of their idea that charity is selfless and not just another vector for the wealthy to exert control.
Sorry if I was not clear, I meant that using “trust-based philanthropy” to describe what she's doing reveals that "normal" philanthropy is all about control and is insufficient by design.
Edit: also, trust-based philanthropy doesn't mean that a trust oversees how the money it's used, it means the philanthropist trusts the charity to use the money well without putting strings on it.
Ahhhhh. And bob's yer uncle. Thanks comrade. o7