Can any one tell me why I shoudl give a shit if she votes no or present when the thing passed with massive margins anyway? It literally makes no material difference. If she voted present and a no vote could have blocked I'd get it but this??? This makes no material difference, and I want to restrict myself to material analysis

Jesus fucking christ the left is so fucking powerless we are sitting around constantly whining about this one fucking soc dem representative and her meaningless protest vote and talking about if her dress was cringe or not?

Who fucking cares??

There will be a lot of very clever protest signs with funny slogans. Twitter posts about how this is exactly like when the death eaters attacked Hogwarts

Your brother is the guy who posted this

I would not consider that to be zero covid/eradication of covid. Even countries which have done very well, like Taiwan, SK and China, still have cases (China is getting like 25~100 a day) and have sporadic outbreaks. That's not zero.

Zero covid would be the eradication of the disease, the way Smallpox was eradicated.

That was never the stated goalpost of anyone who knew wtf they were talking about. Can you find me any article by any expert from early/mid 2020 saying "yeah, eradicating covid is a believable and reasonable goal"?

I guess I worry about all those failures bringing me down

Well, it's never fun. I don't like it either. It doesn't feel like the end of the world to me tho like it used to. I don't like to be rejected, but I'm calloused to it now. It doesn't hurt me now nearly as much as it did when I was 17. I honestly think that getting a few rejections can work well as a form of exposure therapy. Having past successes help also, because it gives you the knowledge that "Ok well, [ex-gf1] and [ex-gf2] both dated me for months, so obviously I can get a gf, I just need to wade thru the rejections until I get a find a lady I click with."

But what IS the first move?! Is it asking her to coffee, it it talking to her, what?

This is really context depended imo. Some people meet on tinder/in a bar and directly go to the other's apt to bang the very same night without even going on a real date. If you meet someone thru work or class or whatev, this is prob not gonna happen like that.

IMO, for a first date, coffee is fine. Just say like "Hey, you free this weekend? let's go out on a date and have lunch/a coffee/a beer at [place]." I always use the word "date" because I think it's better to be direct and up front about what you want. I don't say 'let's hang out' or whatever when I actually want to bust a nut have a mutually respectful romantic encounter.

A coffee or a couple beers at a lowkey bar (someplace where the music isn't so loud you can't talk) is best imo. It doesn't need to be fancy. You're getting to know each other.

Also, touching someone casually on the first date isn’t bad? I’m a bit touch-averse, so this is all new to me.

Personally, I am not touch averse. I use touch to show affection. I like to receive touch. I'm a hugger. I hug my male, platonic buddies after a hang out and have no qualms about putting my arm around my best bros or even sharing one of these . I also like to touch the lady I'm dating. If your date is fine with it and you are also fine with it, why would it be bad? Some women like it, some do not. Generally you can tell by paying attention to those aforementioned hints. If its unclear, I see no problem with literally just straight up asking "hey, is this okay?" or whatever. You start with some small, subtle, casual touch, (brief touch on the wrist, hand or shoulder) if she responds positively (doesn't give the 'stop' hints), there's no problem with more touching, is there? And again, if its unclear (it usually is not to me, if I pay attention to the signs) , I can literally just ask directly.

Your first date goes well and you're walking from the cafe to the frozen yogurt place down the road for desert? I see no problem with putting my arm around her waist, as long as she's fine with it, where's the problem? This is 2021, people out here literally fucking someone who's name they don't even know.

edit:

No, I can take a no without complaining or being rude to who says it. It’s how I start taking it as an indictment of who I am as a person that’s bad…

again: accidentally causing someone to feel awkward for a few minutes does not make you a sex pest.

I get that. Everyone feels that to a certain extent. It's human.

But, in my experience, it does get better. Flirting never came naturally to me, but I learned how to do it with practice. Here's the advice that I would give to myself if I could write a letter to the teenage kissless virgin that I was a decade ago.

There's a few things you're juts gonna have to accept.

1- You have to accept that you will get rejected. This is okay. I've been rejected more times than I could even recall. That's okay. Especially if you are looking for LTR (as I typically do) you only need to get it right once, and then you can forget about it for as long as your relationship lasts. Missing 20 shots in a row doesn't matter if the 21st shot is a bull's eye. To paraphrase a certain Irish militant group "Today we were unlucky, but remember: we only have to be lucky once."

2 - You have to accept that you might create an awkward situation. This is okay. Causing an awkward/uncomfortable situation is not the end of the world. It's not desirable, but it happens sometimes. What you said up there in OP is stuff that I identify with a lot, because I often feel it also. As you said, a man basically has to make the first move, because (as I said) the majority of women will not make the first move in the majority of situations (actually, I've found that a handful of them also won't make the first, second, or third move, my current SO was like this).

Combine the fact that you have to make the first move with the fact that you can't know with complete certainty if a woman is interested before you make that move, and we wind up with the fact that you are very likely to hit on/flirt with/ask out a woman that is not interested in you. This may indeed be awkward and uncomfortable.

That's okay. Accidentally causing someone to feel awkward for a few minutes does not make you a sex pest. Just learn how to take a 'no' graciously.

Sometimes women may not give a direct 'no. Often they hint at it. They will indicate that they are not interested by, say, ghosting you, or if you are in person, they will lean away from you. They might say "yes" to a date and then ghost you later when you try to set it up over text. So learn how to take a 'no' graciously and also learn how to take the hint graciously. So, say, you try to flirt on the first date by putting your hand on her shoulder, and you find that she leans away from you, and doesn't reciprocate your touch. Take the hint. If you take the hint and back off after getting it, no harm, no foul. It doesn't make you a sex pest

Just dropping in to say. Please don't listen to that advice.

Majority of women will not make the first move, and if you sit around waiting for that to happen, you will be single for years at a time. Some women will, most will not.

It might be patriarchal conditioning, but it is the world we live in.

Feel free to make the first move. It's not a crime. Just be respectful to her and take the hint if she seems uninterested.

Just remember what every shit lib on twitter says. These people are in charge because they're so smart and competent. That being the case, this is clearly malice or indifference

forreal, I lost weight merely by giving up soda.

For most people tho, I think keto is so extreme that it becomes too difficult to maintain. Most people want to have a beer every now and again, and want to eat pizza with their friends on friday night.

The thing is, you can still lose wight even while eating some of that stuff, as long as you keep it under a certain level. People asked me how I lost 20 lbs over a single semester and I tell them to calorie count. You can eat what you want, but you just cant always eat as much of it as you want, or as frequently as you want.

I mean that's def true, there are people lifting who dont care about fat, but I think most novice lifters are motivated at least in part by the idea of looking better when they are shirtless. And GOMAD is usually recommended to people who are just starting out since it's associated with the Starting Strength program. Gaining a bunch of extra fat is not really needed or desired by the average American.

for keto or low carb diets, every time I hear someone say "Yea, low carb diets really work, I've been doing for 2 months and lost x pounds and feel so much better"

I just think, ok, so what you're telling me is that you cut out pizza, cake, cookies, doughnuts, pie, ice cream, sugary Starbucks drinks, candy, beer, fries, soda etc and then you lost weight and felt better?

Yea no shit, that's cause all of that food junk that's super high in calories and super low in nutritional value. Obviously if you cut down on that and replace it with eggs, meats, beans, vegetables, water, you will feel better.

That doesn't mean that having a banana in the morning or a bowl of rice at dinner is going to make you fat tho. People in Japan/China/Korea are eating rice everyday and they are skinny and live to be like 95 years old.

Good source of protein and such for people who want to bulk up, but it seems like there are better ways to do that today. Just drink a protein shake with a couple scoops and some fruit or PB or whatever if you want to get in extra calories and protein. You need those cals/protein for gaining muscle mass but I don't see how you could do GOMAD and not also gain a bunch of fat, which I don't think most gym goers want. altho some quite skinny people could benefit from that I guess, if they have too little fat.

People also say it makes them fart all day, which is reason enough for me to avoid it

deleted by creator

Apple has been like that for decades. Just like how their computers used to have just one one button. Steve Jobs thought that his users were too fucking stupid to figure out how to use a left and right click.

I hate their design philosophy because, like you said, it's all oriented toward being a status symbol and being easy to use for the tech illiterate

I mean capitalism can be a factor but sexism in Korea is a lot older than capitalism in Korea. Pre-capitalist Korea (Joseon Dynasty) was not a great place for women

Idk that it's really representative of the average SK feminist. Theres like not even 5 thousand of them.

I mean the people on that site really are like the worst stereotype if a feminist from 2016 sjw cringe videos. Megalia got shot down a few years ago but there's an off shoot called "Womad" (portmanteau of woman+ mad) which is extremely terfy and homophobic. And supposedly users have posted stuff like, saying that they want to torture and kill male kittens because they hate males, or that they want to sexually abuse elementary school boys.

I guess most of that arises from being in a society which is genuinely pretty sexist, and I dont know if they mean it earnestly or are just trolling (or combo of both), but uhh. Kinda sus

But again, theres not very many of them. The average SK feminist just want legal abortion and equal treatment in the work place and such

Edit: even tho they are marginal, they do make a very convenient target for reactionaries who want to dismiss and discredit the feminist movement

AMLO in Mexico maybe? Idk I haven't payed very close attention to the stuff going on there. Is he good?

That's true. I mean serfs were kind of slave like in some ways, but any discussion of slavery in a site like this where most discussion is centered around the US... I mean, medieval serfs had it pretty rough sometimes I guess but not as rough as a slave in the US

Socialism is probably gonna have a hard time if it needs to be tied to anti-theism. The vast majority of working people around the world are religious.