![](https://aussie.zone/pictrs/image/342697c3-bccc-48f9-a49a-33f300c76ac0.png)
Better question might be is it good for us. Sure sounds like a fox in the hen house situation though. I guess we'll see.
Better question might be is it good for us. Sure sounds like a fox in the hen house situation though. I guess we'll see.
Initialization is a subset of assignment. Its initialization the first time you do an assignment.
I dont think declaration and definition overlap, but they are similar concepts. I think i would have swapped your descriptions though. Normally you have a function definition, which describes the function and its features, and you have variable declarations, which is literal objects/bits of memory.
Please dont take this response as gospel, i am not super happy with it :/
I think you mean boating. Not sure driving is feasable anymore :D
The toilet has a face
Ah, yeah, that'll do it.
Is there some kind of translation issue going on here? Why would a medical body want to legalise negligence?
Remember, if you:re self checking out, all tomatoes are truss tomatos :D
I watched that video when it came out, but never made the connection to that being useful to me. I might give that a go when my replacement glass bed fails. Thanks!
Ah, yup, missed that one for todat, wasnt sure when youd mod me, ill set some alarms and make sure I get the next few days.
I am well suited for the timezone stuff, thats just after midday for me.
Report handling likely wont be as responsive, due to timezone, but i'll do what i can.
Happy volunteer to help out with this.
Some of the challenges feasably could be solved with a pen and paper amd a keen eye, giving a line count of 0.
#nocode :D
Could you give an idea of what is required/standard workflow? Dont want to put up my hand and then find out i cant do it.
Very understandable. And from a security standpoint not necessarily indicitive of anything. A good malicious script would just check its environment first.
Have you considered some form of CI? I.e: Spin up a VM, run the script, reboot, report what changed? Might be a little expensive, but could help auditing?
You have probably invested a lot of time and effort into this, so please take this as constructive criticism.
Your security systems are probably not going to be sufficient, for a whole number of reasons.
The general public is not able to appropriately audit shell scripts. This extends even to sysadmins and more technical people. The people who can properly audit scripts are a minority, and they may not even be amongst your user base. Anyone who gets a script that "does its job" is going to upvote it as fine, because they may not even be aware of its malicious side effects.
Scripts will naturally need to evolve over time, so script updates will be a normal part of your system. Will the votes reset for new versions? Is there anything stopping someone uploading farming votes with valid scripts, and then backdoor the script once it gets sufficiently popular?
Is there any form of vote manipulation prevention planned? If not, bad actors can create an army of accounts and upvote their malicious content. Can you remove a users votes if they are found to be acting maliciously? Will it even be possible for you to tell the difference between a naive user who doesn't understand the maliciousness of the script, versus an account actively increasing the rating of a bad package?
This seems easy to game as well. Upload a host of valid scripts, gain reputation, and then when ready, upload malicious scripts.
Allowing non-maintainers to edit and upload scripts seems like a wildly bad idea. There must be some level of maintainer approval for that right? Still will have the same issues, easy for someone to build trust on a script repo and then exploit it when it suits them.
None of these issues are unique to your site, pypi, dockerhub etc have all hit these issues in the past.
I think the only real answer is to have very strong human moderation, but I fear that if your site takes off, the workload will rapidly spiral out of control. Otherwise, interesting idea, Good Luck!
Your probably right, that looks quite desirable.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/switch - hasnt it had this forever? Or are you refering to something else?
Does this article need to exist? I assumed anyone writing a nested ternary was intentionally writing shit code
They are absolutely right, but will be interesting to see the reaction from the tinfoil hat lot.
I've never understood the point of signing commits. If i can push a commit to a repo, then i can also add my own keys to the repo as well right? So malicious actor with my password can happily push signed commits?
Do many people actually sign commits?