![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/71e983ce-051c-49f4-b70d-7a371dd2efe2.jpeg)
The logic is remarkably similar. Thanks for proving Graeber's point.
The logic is remarkably similar. Thanks for proving Graeber's point.
deleted by creator
Taboos are like private property but for truth. Your expectations seem to go beyond conviviality and comradeship when people should accept your schema as exempt from critical interrogation. In effect, you are making private property claims in other people's heads.
(I upbeared this whole strand of the thread after someone submerged it)
Caring about taboos is a material condition?
Well, yeah, that's exactly the liberal salvation narrative.
Beer is not a personal lubricant, only an interpersonal one
heteros mad (x24)
deleted by creator
Emir Kusturica's Underground wore that plot better without the tedious rom-com angle.
Funny, it makes me a lot less willing to put up with private property. Maybe you need to try a different strain.
If the Belt and Road is going to be neoliberal, then fuck it, sink that shit.
Property is actually life now?
We're fucked.
That's not certain. He could have killed himself after not killing himself.
Recommended. It makes nihilism look so much more entertaining.
Why do you hate the global poor?
Gulag themed cock cages: is there a market?
I don't doubt at all that /c/technology would appreciate a good effortpost, and yours is a good one. This angle of what relentless miniaturization could have done for the USSR would also make a fun listicle, if you felt more popular-science.
I came in interest after y'all got bounced from reddit. My goals are to destroy the concept of private property in the concrete and in the abstract to the greatest extent practicable, and encourage systems thinking as an aid to understanding the liberal mind so that we all can pith it more effectively and have some chance of an ideology not neoliberalism surviving the next 20 years.
I guess I need to log off until I finish this. That synthesis is harder to find than I expected.