Removed by mod

They did you a favor tbh. Nothing really valuable on there

Removed by mod

Like most social phenomena, this doesn't have simple explanations

I think those sentences are coherent. It says Marx supported liberal rights like freedom of the press, but opposed private property rights. A socialist transformation can guarantee the good liberal rights while abolishing the bad one (private property)

Not really

In Shoikhedbrod’s reading, Marx is very much a dialectical critic of liberalism rather than a straight-up naysayer. He admires the liberties provided by liberal law — particularly freedom of the press — touting them as an enormous gain over the restrictions of feudal aristocracy. Early in his career Marx even juxtaposes the liberatory potential of “rational” liberal law to the prejudices of “tradition.”

I don't see the point of the Mills article, but I thought the Rawls article was good

Wow the US really loves the Guantanamo Bay detainees

Damn I guess BadEmpanada's video on them was vindicated

Uhhhh critical support to Musk?

It's called multitasking, sweaty

Ok but when will Hasan react to Destiny react to Vaush?

Tbh I haven't really looked at 9/11 conspiracies so idk. But even within a certain topic, like the JFK ones, there's different levels of efficacy. Like I think pointing out inconsistencies in the Warren Commission is more believable then trying to construct an alternative narrative without solid evidence

What does it say about our society that the richest person is an emotionally immature man-child?

Not all communists are Stalinists

I don't think you can collapse all conspiracy theories into one thing you believe or not. There's different levels of efficacy between JFK theories, moon landing hoax, etc.

It refers to a specific kind of communist, a Stalinist / Marxist-Leninist

I've heard China: A History by John Keay is good

Thank you so much!

Is Mafia III still available?