I'll explain now why it's such a dishonest question. It's a false equivalence that sets the bar for agreeing with an opinion at being willing to die for it yourself. That is incorrect, logically speaking. The bar for agreeing with this opinion would be whether or not I'd be willing to fight and die for MY country if it was being invaded by Russians. That's the core dishonesty of your question, that if I support their cause, I should be willing to fight and die for it myself.

I also wouldn't personally say that every last able-bodied man should fight. Say we have a Ukrainian man whose brother was killed, his brother's wife is disabled, and she has 6 kids. I would have nothing to say about what that individual man should do, and if he chose to help his sister in law get her orphaned children out of Ukraine, away from the war, and take care of them, that's his honorable choice. That brings us to the second dishonest part of your question, it sets the implied bar at a point where if one supports a country that continues fighting for its freedom against a violent aggressor, that we must naturally support the notion that every individual in that country should fight as well. It's taking a macro level question and trying to apply it to every individual; attempting to turn a nuanced opinion into a black and white one by disregarding the contextual realities at the individual level.

Your dishonesty is embedded in the question.

Removed by mod

I said what I said, you're not in charge of shit here. Nobody needs to answer your stupid question first in order to speak their mind. How about you start by acknowledging that Russia is the fascist aggressor in this war, could stop it at any minute by returning to their own territory, and admitting that they're simply the bad guys in this war? Can you say that?

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

"You oppose Russia yet you don't want to go fight them yourself, why?" is a ridiculous question that you're pretending is a rational one. You're intellectually dishonest af here, and you say you're "not arguing" simply because you're putting your absolute bullshit in the form of a question.

You're calling someone else a weasel while calling this "offer" a peace deal? Look in the mirror.

Is Ticketmaster telling the truth?

In a word, no. They are second only to the US Treasury in "printing money."

My immediate suspicion of the cause of this was that Ticketmaster wasn't donating enough money to the right people's campaigns.

I hear ya. In its heyday it was something else. It's been bastardized, dumbed down, littered with microtransactions and mass marketed to hell now by a company that bears only the name Blizzard...a rotten husk of its former self that deserves all the hate it gets...but before all that, it brought some great memories and feelings of group achievement that are still irreplaceable to me.

Preliminary testes have suggested it will be an issue, but we need another few rounds of testes to be sure.

The sequel to Trump screwing Stormy Daniels...Stormy Daniels screwing Trump.

I welcome the controversy, but World of Warcraft.

I wasn't sure what the right answer to this question would be until I saw it.

Exactly. And the entire reason I like to kill stuff in video games is that I have zero desire to do it in real life.

You know that part in 12 monkeys where plant life has overgrown all the buildings and animals are free to roam our cities? That one.

"Oh nooooo......anyway..."

Biden administration last week: We think there's good reason to believe that Israel has used our weapons in a way that violates international law.

That same day: "Are you still going to give them weapons though?"

A: Oh, of course we are...nobody said anything about that. We're talking billions with a B.

So anyway, he started blasting for real this time.

Exactly, the author was like "How dare they not both sides this."