Hexbears when they have to call the global southern subalterns "patsocs" and ban them from the dunktank. 
i've been calling him r-slur don since day one.
damn i hate these guys.
You're fine, unless you were wearing a tiny beanie (indoors) and a band t-shirt, like he was. And if that's the case, you're now on notice
looking forward to stories about how hamas fighters made israeli colonists a bit uncomfortable by manspreading in the getaway toyota hiluxes.
majority report and they have some gen-x dad-rocker on to talk policing and mental health and he is giving meandering personal anecdotes that don't pertain to anything and they try to steer him back to a discussion of policy prescriptions and he responds, eggs have to be broken to make an omlet, and emma is irritated by the fact that this dude is a total blowhard, and follows up with, what does that even mean, and he says, we can't throw the baby out with the bath water.
my man, what are these idioms? get this moron off the air.
Having NATO soldiers being absolutely decimated, would certainly calm the bloodlust of the Western masses.
Uh, or it whips the Western decisionmakers into a frenzy and gives pretext for a wider conflict.
There's no way defamation damages are worth the reputational and legal risk. And even if they were, Boeing would've moved to kill him earlier then.
Again, if they needed him dead to avoid very incriminating facts entering the record, presumably they'd do it before two days of depos.
Dude was sick and spited Boeing on his way out.
Picture of Mark and Jez dressed as SS officers, but I've edited it so they're also in Jazz Singer make up, asking themselves, of course, if they're the baddies.
very cool vid. appreciate that the early soviet officers/hipsters were leather daddies.
In a country that should really be in NATO if they’r had any balls for that matter
Huh I wonder if Ukraine and the West considered having Ukraine join NATO before the SMO? Did anyone consider that lmao.
Not to pile on you, but whether or not his domestic efforts are sufficient or at least worth holding ones nose, his treatment of Palestine is disqualifying to anyone w half a brain.
But apart from the moral question, which you evidently couldn't be bothered by, if it's such an easy choice, why is he polling so badly? It's simple: he's a bad candidate. He's polling dreadfully in what should be another easy Dem win, he's universally seen as being illequipped for the job (humiliations in Afghanistan (frankly one of few his unambiguous Ws), Ukraine, and now Palestine, with the Court, w Texas, ceding the immigration issue to Republicans, cant string two sentences together)-- why are you wasting energy caping for him? The Dems have enough time to replace him. You'd avoid these pitiable indignities.
Most stable Lacan reader.
Add please
That's a lot of unleavened bread!
Removed by mod