I don’t fudge rolls, but I do dynamically adjust enemy’s max HP depending on how well my players are doing.

While conflicts of interest can and do exist, a lot of, if not most, science is done by grad students who are just trying to get their degree and are really there because they are passionate about discovering new things more than anything else.

What you’d buy is “domain.com” and can then redirect any emails of the form “<anything>@domain.com” or even things like “<anything>@<anything>.domain.com”.

In fact, any email ending in “.domain.com” or “@domain.com”. And you could set up a wildcard to catch all emails without having to setup that specific email first.

You can host a git repo with little effort on any Linux machine you can ssh to. You don’t need to host a git lab instance unless you want some web gui.

I think the company sees this as an opportunity to use the spotlight they now have to publicize their own IP. I suppose we can only wait and see what they do next.

?

Larion Studios is still doing fine. They’ve decided to pursue their own IP rather than continue to work with a 3rd party’s.

If your problem with signal is that it isn’t self-hosted, just self-host it? It’s all open source.

I think if I ate 175 pounds of cured meat, the sodium isn’t what would kill me.

This is that “enlightened centrism” false equivalence.

I honestly can’t believe that in good faith you can compare Biden and Trump as equals.

One is a president whos platform is making minimal change.

The other is a president whos platform is to tear down democracy and human rights.

If you honestly can look at these two and say they are equal than I have to conclude you are at least indifferent to maintaining democracy and human rights.

I know the “counter argument” is about Biden and Israel/Gaza, but the thing is, that’s not really up for debate because I don’t believe there’s any chance Trump would be better about Gaza.

There are 2 options:

• death in Gaza and status quo in the US
• death in Gaza and loss of human rights and possibly our democracy in the US

You don’t get to make a “US Defaultism” comment after implying you had the right to vote in the U.S. election.

The assumption is OP isn’t a Trump supporter.

Can you protest and/or talk negatively about the government online?

The Shire

Face it: there are only two candidates who realistically have a chance at winning the general election. It’s been that way for every US election we’ve seen.

If you vote for someone who doesn’t have a realistic chance of winning, that’s about the same as just not voting at all.

So you really have 3 choices: candidate A, candidate B, or indifference.

And there are two possible outcomes: candidate A or candidate B.

If one of those outcomes is at all preferable to the other, (e.g. either A is “better” or B is “worse”), it’s strategically best to vote for the main candidate you prefer, since that increases the chance of getting your preference of the two outcomes.

Isn’t it a bit different when one candidate/party has outright said they plan to take steps to end democracy, and has previously participated in an attempted coup?

It’s a parody of what a fascist US would look like and it’s not subtle about it.

I’m more interested in what Larian makes next tbh.

Gross

The standard deviation can be very high with the mean and median being the same.

What the difference between the mean and median indicates is a highly skewed (not normal) distribution.

The short answer is, when your computer sends a message over the network, the IP address specifies which computer should receive the message, and the port specifies which program should receive the message.