• 11 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle














  • _edge@discuss.tchncs.detoProgrammer Humor@programming.dev===
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago
    ==    same (after magic)
    ===   same and same type (in Javascript)
    ====  same and same type and same actual type (in the backend before conversion to JSON)
    ===== same and same type and same actual type and same desired type (what the customer wanted)
    







  • Well, I'd file this as innovation. Innovation is trying and failing. It's an experiment. And I'm okay with this.

    Is it wasteful to have KDE and Gnome? Why don't they give up and merge with each other? Did we really need systemd? Or docker? And why Wayland when every single distro is on X and every single application is on X?

    Ubuntu started as a Gnome-based distribution and it is was better than the competition on the desktop at the time. Or good enough. It got popular.

    Personally, I wasn't a big fan of Unity or Gnome 3, but it worked. I found snap totally weird and against how things should be on a Linux system. But snap updates (while still annoying) have solved problems with deb-based updates of browser ("Quit all running firefox or you'll experience problems").

    Maybe I'd like Debian more. After all I came from Debian to Ubuntu. But it's not worth to make a fuzz.



  • _edge@discuss.tchncs.detoLinux@lemmy.mlIs Ubuntu deserving the hate?
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Ubuntu is nice. Apt/DEB works as they should. Some default apps, mostly browsers, are snaps now, but this does not bother you at all. You were getting them from your distro anyway.

    Flatpak and AppImages work just fine if you need them.

    The Ubuntu desktop (any flavour) just works. Others are different, but nothing is bad about Ubuntu.

    Ubuntu is trying new things, proprietary to their ecosystem, e.g. Unity or snap. On the big picture, those are experiment. Ubuntu is still Linux.

    The community reaction to snap is overblown. So Canonical developed something you don't like? Ignore it. This has mostly been a waste of time for them.

    (Yes, maybe that dev time would be better spent on flatpak or open-source apps. But that's their time. I'm not paying Ubuntu developers, so can I really complain?)