I don't get it. Did Socrates discuss gender identity in his works?

Only to realise later it was the imposter syndrome or Dunning-Kruger effect kicking in.

And I don't like how sparse the data points are but they went with a wobbly interpolated curve anyway.

It exists, kind of. Python has this construct

for item in iterable:
    ...
else:
     ...

which always puzzles me, since it depends on a break statement execution. I always have to look it up when the else block is executed.

That math does not check out. There are only 8.1 billion humans alive. How can there be trillions of companies?

Lemmyverse? How will that exist in the Fediverse?

Fediverse > Lemmy Galaxy / Cluster?

Well, he does have a point though. #OpenAccess

Footnote: Yeah, I saw that he had done some bad faith research, but remember open access is for everyone in the world, not just free rider corporate shills.

Footnote 2: If it is not feasible to go for gold OA journals, please go for green route: publish in closed but allows authors to put it up on preprint like arXiv.

He was from the future. Look, he's reading from a book made of flexible glowing paper and not flat tablets like we primitive people do.

Accessible for everyone.

If the desktop UX has very good screen readers, keyboard navigation, voice to text etc., I believe its benefits would automatically spill over to all.

Also it would retain the UI / UX experts who become forced to abandon Linux for macOS which maintains a niche in this.

Pikachu, iron tail!

It is not, Fairphone already does this.

Good point, and Łukasz Langa mentioned this in his talk (check it out). He names it the robustness principle, in his words (around 22:20 mark:

"Vague in what you accept, concrete in what you return"

But he also mentions some gotchas like how Iterable[str] can backfire, because str is also an Iterable[str] and it might be better to use list[str].