I didn't think liberals would get violent about the election outcome. No one seemed passionate about her, let alone fanatical enough to riot. The vast majority who voted for her did so because they disliked Trump not because they liked her ever fluctuating policies or her in general.

Microsoft is due a terrible release, 7, 8, & 10 were all above average.

Proposal to ban AstroGnomeical, posting duplicate comments on multiple posts with no desire for discussion.

You kids and your emojis

Just wanted to make sure, normal people don't send other people kissy face emojis unless they are interested in them.

I hate to break it to you but I'm happily married.

Good to know

I see a mashup comming of what she's promising and what she's done.

The problem with climate zealots is they don't care how they spend others money they just want to see "progress".

So the idiotic rush to save the environment at all costs was wasteful.

OpenSueUs

The most cringe thing about it is worrying about being cringe.

Yup

Than that point is irrelevant.

Saying "for children" doesn't make money appear

It's 40 million dollars

Just a little bit more, it's for a good cause is not a good gauge, any program could be shoehorned into those criteria.

It doesn't take long to overflow the bucket by adding small drops.

Nah, I just don’t care to proof read for somebody who is incapable of understanding what I’m saying from the get go.

Proper English does wonders for communicating your thoughts, you should try it.

No it isn’t. There’s a million reasons why education outcomes are the way they are. You can’t just point to the outcomes and say X reason and X reason alone is the cause.

And yet you are incapable of listing one

Because both groups fall under the umbrella of kids that are struggling.

And once again I've only mentioned the kids that don't want to be there kids that do are irrelevant to this discussion.

That is by definitely an ad hominem. You are attacking me instead of my position.

Your position is "no it's not" you've provided no substance for that claim. The reason you can't is because you're out of your depth.

If that’s how children teach you, no wonder you think that some can’t be taught.

How children teach me? You're going to have to take a little more time before you post your nonsense. Think about what you are trying to communicate before you reply.

That is not a measure of how easy it is to force kids to learn.

It is, at current levels of resources while forcing kids to learn that's the best that can be done.

I never said there wasn’t a difference. But both groups are kids that are struggling.

I have only discussed kids that don't want to be there, why do you keep bringing other groups up.

This is just an ad hominem.

It's not, you really need to brush up on your logical fallacies. I'm saying your lack of experience has made you unable to distinguish two different groups.