That as the full prompt.

help! The commies are making me think, give me excuses to ignore the things they’re saying! The commies keep taking about how good the free market is, and want to abolish unions, privatize everything, and switch to poll taxes!

Exactly! Many of the criteria included aren't all that good for new users, and neither are the suggestions. It's not really a good resource for experienced users either.

It's how German works - when you have a noun by itself (i.e. not part of a sentence), it goes with the article by default.

They can easily last much longer than 5-6 years. If the age is the only reason you're thinking of switching, you might check its health self-report first.

threads.net is currently blocked. You can see a complete list of blocked instances here. There was a discussion about this when threads first announced plans to federate.

I wouldn't say there's a place to start. Once you start using programs that are configured through config files, learn about those config files in particular. Eventually, you might find that you prefer editing config files even for programs that have GUI settings - then you dive in more.

Regardless, once your config files become complex enough that you can't quickly rewrite them if necessary, start looking for a dotfiles manager, tracking them in git, backing them up, etc...

That's not very deep. Closer to plain old logistic regression, really.

Learning git is very easy. For example, to do it on Debain, one simply needs to run, sudo apt install lazygit

deleted by creator

I can already see it: From northern Gaza, to southern Gaza, then Sinai, and then - to "Madagascar".

If his alternative was boat, from what I've read, they aren't really better...

I have experience with GPT-4, and in particular I've used to for math questions in my work occasionally. I'm not sure how Bing chat compares.

For GTP-4, I've noticed the following:

1. How reliable the answer is depends on how easy or obscure the question is. It hasn't lied to me on easy or introductory material, but once your questions start becoming more obscure, and it's less likely to have the answer in the training set, it starts making things up.

• I think of it as search to an extent - it needs to have the answer in the training data to find it. Unlike google, it can usually find an answer even if you don't use the proper terms. But if it doesn't find an answer, it might make something up.
• "Easy or introductory" is relative - I have been able to get good answers for some masters-level math, and some wrong ones for lower-level things. Ultimately it depends on how much resources on the topic have been in the training set.

2. It's actually much more reliable in detecting errors than it's in generating text. So you can open a new chat and ask, "Is the following true: ..." and it will catch most of its own errors. Once it starts catching error, you should know you've left the reliable "easy questions" territory, and even if it can still be useful, exercise much more care.
3. The way you phrase a prompt matters a lot. For example, if you ask it to explain its reasoning step by step, it becomes much more accurate.
4. It is generally good in rephrasing questions to use better terminology.

.

Bing chat might be different in some regards. I know that it automatically searches the web for sources, and when generating an answer, and bases its answer on the contents of the sources it found - but I don't have experience with it.

That said, asking for additional sources (besides the search results it found) shouldn't improve the accuracy. It might just give you something you can use to fact-check it.

Earth. If there's any aliens in the Solar system, they can clearly hide from us pretty well, and I'm not really sure what they'd be interested in on any other planet...

What you're talking about is called "feature creep" and is a surefire road to poor quality.

I, for example, don't use any of the extensions you mentioned. And I checked two at random and both had less than 10k users, so they're by no means "must have". If they had to include all functionality that every "power user who does not appreciate having to frequently add new extensions" ever wanted, they might as well just rename it FireDinosaur or something. It will be both extremely heavy, and quickly extinct.

There is a difference between forefox-based browser and chromium-based one. Namely, if you base it on chromium, you take the blink engine and you can build watever UI around it you want. If you base it on firefox, you actually have to take the full firefox code and make changes to it.

All those firefox-based browsers are very similar to firefox with some small changes made. If you actually want to make large changes, keeping up with updates will quickly become a mess.

By contrast, qutebrowser has very little in common with Chromium except for the rendering engine - the user experience is totally different.

Also, bundling extensions with the browser is not the way to cater to power users - they will install the extensions they want anyway.

If gecko became embeddable (or better yet, servo was finished), so users could make alternative firefox-based browsers, that would be really good for power users. Right now things like qutebrowser are all based on blink, because that's the only option.

He said it was critical to “try to avoid the alliance of China plus Russia, plus parts of the global south.

Well, if it's critical to avoid that, then don't act so as to best encourage it.

Actually, reporting issues is not considered a bad practice in open source. If the corporation expects the dev to work for free, that's a problem. But I found the original bug report, and it's just a normal report. It doesn't read entitled, doesn't demand "Fix it NOW!!!", simply explains an issue.

A way to deal with false positives of an ML NSFW scanner would be: Once per day, each user can "overwrite" the scanner. If a user is caught abusing this, they get banned.