Food in the past was kind of incredible in the "I can't believe people used to live like that" way.
Food in the past was kind of incredible in the "I can't believe people used to live like that" way.
https://www.theonion.com/bum-rush-hour-1846606314
I think the problem is that it's also being sold as a dlc of sorts.
Even if it can be obtained in-game without purchasing it separately, why is it available for purchase?
It does not diminish my enjoyment of the game, I do not care because it does not affect me.
If it does bother me, doesn't that make it fine to complain about it? If I don't like seeing microtransactions in a game I paid full price for (or even just the trend of this happening across the industry), or if I don't like knowing that some features in the game that used to be free were put into a cash shop, or if I don't like that executives are trying to monetize every aspect of my experience, even after they've already gotten money out of me, shouldn't it be well within my right to criticize the game and company for degrading my experience?
And if you truly aren't bothered by it but see that some people are, should you really be trying to defend the practice? You have every right to not be bothered by in-game monetization and not complain about it, but do you really need to try and convince other people that are bothered by it that it isn't really such a big deal?
It still looks fake, but the dailymail article is real, and it might actually link back to a real newspaper, but I'm not too sure about it. And even if it is real, the original article is apparently from 1938.
I seem to recall Trump signing some kind of treaty promising all troops would be pulled out near the start of Biden's term, and then there was a big panic as everyone left in a rush because we didn't really plan it all that well. Weren't there a lot of videos of people running alongside airplanes that were taking off, and something about our old bases being found mostly intact?