There were optimizations related to database triggers, these are probably responsible for the speedup.

https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/pull/4696

4

3

No that's a completely different issue.

Yes something seems to be broken, but so far we don't have any idea what it might be. On Monday we will deploy the 0.19.4 release candidate which has various performance improvements, hopefully that will help.

2

1

Alright Ive added @kevincox@lemmy.ml, @CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml and @Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml as mods and removed the inactive ones.

asd 2

It was always normalized, but recently there seems to be more backlash from maintainers.

Its back up now.

Something filled up all the server RAM, not sure what. A restart fixed it.

Well written, it would deserve a separate post.

We only do major versions around once a year so those could still be named, while using numbers for minor versions. Lemmy is more user-facing than react, so it would make sense to have a more user-friendly versioning.

We didnt make any changes to the Lemmy version running on this instance during the past week. So it must be something else...

This is strange because neither of the communities you mentioned has any language restrictions. Can you say what error is being returned exactly? You might have to use browser dev tools to see the details.

Showing authorship would be quite tricky because there might be dozens of editors, and the Lemmy ui simply doesnt have space for that. Editing articles from Lemmy would also be tricky , so yes some type of single signon would make more sense.

Wikipedia is simply the one I'm familiar with, and learning about all these problems was what motivated me to start working on Ibis. But afaik Wikia doesn't work any different in a technical sense, so of course Ibis can also be used for those cases.

Thanks for the support. I think the era of single, centralized sources of information will soon be in the past.

1. This would be a project on its own, with writing import scripts, hosting an instance etc. Certainly not something I have time for, just like I'm not running a Reddit mirror for Lemmy. If you or someone else wants to set it up, go ahead!
2. How would you detect that it's the same article, only from having the identical title? That could fail in lots of ways.
3. I agree about this.

I agree that it would make sense to integrate a wiki into Lemmy. However that's much more complicated than a standalone project, because it needs to integrate well with all the existing features. Plus it means more work for all the Lemmy developers, while Ibis could be handled by a completely separate dev team.

Also having Ibis tightly integrated with Lemmy would automatically limit the userbase to existing Lemmy users. The potential userbase for an independent project is much bigger.

That said it would be good if Ibis can optionally integrate with Lemmy, but I'm not sure yet how that would work. The most straightforward option would be to treat Ibis articles as normal Lemmy posts, but maybe that doesn't make the most sense.